Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Liver Transpl. 2013 Dec 12;20(1):100–115. doi: 10.1002/lt.23769

Table 7. Socioeconomic and Social Status Variables by Race/Ethnicity for the Study Population From GTF From Transplantation Through the Follow-Up Period (1998-2011).

Socioeconomic and Social Status Study Population (n=208) Whites [n=106 (51.0%)] Blacks [n=72 (34.6%)] Other [n=30 (14.4%)] P Value
Sought GTF assistance [n (%)] 114 (54.8) 50 (47.2) 49 (68.1) 15 (50.0) 0.0195
Variables for patients who sought assistance
 Net yearly income<30,000 [n (%)]* 79 (70.5) 27 (55.1) 41 (85.4) 11 (73.3) 0.0045
 Highest parental education [n (%)] 0.0012
  Partial high school 20 (26.0) 6 (15.8) 14 (46.7) 0
  High school graduate 40 (52.0) 21 (55.3) 13 (43.3) 6 (66.7)
  Partial college 7 (9.1) 2 (5.3) 3 (10) 2 (22.2)
  College or master's degree 10 (13.0) 9 (23.7) 0 1 (11.1)
 Parental employment status [n (%)] 0.0018
  Full-time employment or student 44 (44.4) 25 (56.8) 10 (23.8) 9 (69.2)
  Part-time employment 14 (14.1) 5 (11.4) 6 (14.3) 3 (23.1)
  Unemployed, disabled, or retired 41 (41.4) 14 (31.8) 26 (61.9) 1 (7.7)
 Public assistance as income source: SSI, TANF, or welfare [n (%)]§ 58 (56.9) 22 (47.8) 31 (70.5) 5 (41.7) 0.0504
 Family structure [n (%)] <0.0001
  Married 45 (42.1) 25 (53.2) 10 (21.7) 10 (71.4)
  Divorced or separated 12 (11.2) 11 (23.4) 0 1 (7.1)
  Single or widowed 50 (46.7) 11 (23.4) 36 (78.3) 3 (21.4)

NOTE: P values in bold are statistically significant (P<0.05).

*

Data were missing for 1.8% of the patients.

Data were missing for 32.5% of the patients.

Data were missing for 13.2% of the patients.

§

Data were missing for 10.5% of the patients.

Data were missing for 6.1% of the patients.