Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Health Psychol. 2014 Jan;33(1):3–10. doi: 10.1037/a0032502

Table 2.

Results of Logistic Regression Analyses Predicting Unprotected Sex, Risky Partners, and STI Diagnosis, Controlling for Site Clustering

Any unprotected sex 3rd Trimester
(N = 841)
Any risky partners 3rd Trimester
(N = 873)
Any STI diagnosis since last
interview 3rd Trimester
(N = 885)
Odds ratios (95% Confidence intervals)
Outcome during 2nd trimester 2.87 (1.38–5.96)** 5.56 (4.15–7.45)** 11.13 (7.18–17.27)**
Group prenatal care (vs. individual) 1.08 (0.81–1.44) 1.11 (0.70–1.77) 1.26 (0.93–1.72)
Food insecurity 2nd trimester 0.94 (0.69–1.29) 1.14 (0.82–1.58) 0.73 (0.48–1.10)
Employed 2nd trimester 0.97 (0.64–1.48) 0.66 (0.45–0.97)* 0.69 (0.39–1.22)
In relationship 2nd trimester 2.22 (1.65–2.97)** 1.06 (0.77–1.46) 0.90 (0.52–1.56)
Age (in years) 1.12 (1.02–1.24)* 0.88 (0.81–0.96)** 0.99 (0.88–1.11)
Born outside of U.S. 1.08 (0.88–1.32) 0.77 (0.56–1.04) 1.10 (0.64–1.91)
Latino 0.93 (0.64–1.36) 1.29 (0.76–2.22) 0.81 (0.35–1.87)
Black 0.94 (0.59–1.49) 0.92 (0.49–1.73) 0.92 (0.36–2.36)
Sexual risk knowledge 2nd trimester 1.04 (1.00–1.07)* 1.08 (1.03–1.13)** 1.01 (0.99–1.04)
Condom use norms 2nd trimester 0.91 (0.77–1.07) 0.98 (0.87–1.12) 1.15 (0.92–1.44)
Condom use attitudes 2nd trimester 0.84 (0.69–1.02) 0.88 (0.73–1.05) 0.99 (0.77–1.26)
Condom use barriers 2nd trimester 0.92 (0.75–1.13) 0.96 (0.78–1.19) 0.94 (0.80–1.09)
Condom use self-efficacy 2nd trimester 1.00 (0.98–1.03) 0.99 (0.97–1.02) 0.98 (0.96–1.00)
Everyday Discrimination 2nd trimester 0.88 (0.69–1.11) 1.60 (1.07–2.40)* 1.47 (1.18–1.83)**
*

p < .05;

**

p < .01.