Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Adolesc. 2013 Oct 22;36(6):1193–1204. doi: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2013.08.005

Table 3.

Triple trajectory unstandardized model estimates and fit statistics, without controlling for baseline influences on sexual behavior among (N=328) young women

Sexual Behavior Growth Curve
Intercept Slope

Latent Factor Predictor b(SE) B b(SE) B

Religiosity Intercept −0.14(0.11) −0.01 0.01(0.04) 0.13
Religiosity Slope - - 0.45(0.11) 0.07
Sexual Conservatism Intercept −0.63(0.12)*** −0.60 0.03(0.05) 0.13
Sexual Conservatism Slope −0.28(0.12)** −0.43

Note: χ2(df) =35.046(34), p=0.224; IFI=0.995; TLI=0.989; CFI=0.995; RMSEA (90% CI) =.031 (.000 − .051).

Note: Religiosity intercept/Sexual Conservatism intercept cov (SE) =0.83(0.28)***

Religiosity intercept/Sexual Conservatism slope cov (SE) =−.12(0.13); Religiosity slope/Sexual Conservatism intercept cov (SE) =−0.18(0.15) Religiosity slope/Sexual

Conservatism slope cov (SE) =0.21(0.09)*.

Note: Religiosity freed loading b (SE): 1.39(0.29)***

Sexual Conservatism freed loading b (SE): 1.93 (0.76)***

*p < .05

**

p < .01

***

p <. 001