Table 1.
Study design | Ability of study design to detect types of epigenetic differences | ||
---|---|---|---|
Epigenetic differences related to exposure | Epigenetic differences related to exposure in past generations | Epigenetic differences not a consequence of the disease of interest | |
Case–control studies | Cannot be determined by this study design | Can be established if exposures in past generations are known and DNA samples collected at birth can be assessed† | Cannot be determined by this study design |
Cross-sectional studies | Can be established only if healthy individuals are analyzed or sampling is conducted before the disease developed (e.g., at birth) | Can be established if exposures in past generations are known and DNA samples collected at birth can be assessed† | Due to disease misclassification using one point in time, it is uncertain whether epigenetic differences are also responses to the disease |
Follow-up studies | Can be established only if healthy individuals are analyzed or sampling is conducted before the disease developed (e.g., at birth) | Exploit exposure information and samples from more than one generation | Can be established if healthy subjects are followed-up and the disease developed after onset of epigenetic changes (time order) |
Randomized intervention trials (experimental study) with follow-up | An experimental change of exposure (e.g., smoking cessation) can demonstrate whether the intervention results in an epigenetic response | Can differentiate between epigenetic inheritance and epigenetic responses due to intervention in exposures | Can differentiate whether a disease is a response to epigenetic changes or due to epigenetic inheritance |
Some states in the USA (e.g., CA, MI, NY) and some countries store blood spots collected at birth (Guthrie cards) that can be used for epigenetic studies.