Abstract
Pixantrone, a novel aza-anthracenedione with cytotoxic activity, was tested against the PPTP in vitro panel (3.0 nM to 30.0 μM) and against a limited panel of PPTP Wilms tumors and sarcomas (7.5 mg/kg) administered intravenously using an every 4 day x 3 schedule. In vitro pixantrone showed a median relative IC50 value of 54 nM, (range <3 nM to 1.03 μM). In vivo pixantrone induced significant differences in EFS distribution compared to controls in 2 of 8 solid tumor xenografts at dose levels relevant to human drug exposure. A complete response was observed for one Wilms tumor xenograft.
Keywords: Preclinical Testing, Developmental Therapeutics, Topoisomerase 2 inhibitor
INTRODUCTION
Pixantrone is an aza-anthracenedione that lacks the quinone-hydroquinone site responsible for iron binding that is present in doxorubicin and mitoxantrone [1]. Preclinical testing supports reduced cardiotoxicity for pixantrone, as it induced minimal or no significant cardiotoxicity in treatment-naive mice, in contrast to the marked degenerative cardiomyopathy observed for mice treated similarly with doxorobucin or mitoxantrone [2]. The failure of pixantrone to induce hydrogen peroxide and superoxide anion in ex vivo human cardiac strips, in contrast to the effect of doxorubicin, further supports the reduced cardiac toxicity of pixantrone [3].
Multiple mechanisms may be responsible for the cytotoxicity of pixantrone. Pixantrone shows intercalative interaction with DNA, and it stimulates topoisomerase-II mediated DNA cleavage and DNA-protein cross-links [4–6]. Pixantrone can also form a covalent adduct with DNA following activation by formaldehyde [7,8]. The Preclinical Pediatric Testing Program (PPTP) performed testing of pixantrone to assess its activity against the PPTP in vitro panel and a subset of the PPTP solid tumor models.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
In vitro testing
Testing was performed using DIMSCAN, as previously described in a characterized panel of 24 cell lines [9]. Cells were incubated in the presence of pixantrone for 96 hours at concentrations from 3.0 nM to 30 μM and analyzed as previously described [10].
In vivo tumor growth inhibition studies
CB17SC scid−/− female mice (Taconic Farms, Germantown NY), were used to propagate subcutaneously implanted Wilms tumors, Ewing sarcomas and rhabdomyosarcomas. Female mice were used irrespective of the patient gender from which the original tumor was derived. All mice were maintained under barrier conditions and experiments were conducted using protocols and conditions approved by the institutional animal care and use committee. Ten mice were used in each control or treatment group. Tumor volumes (cm3) were determined and responses were determined using three activity measures as previously described [11]. An in-depth description of the analysis methods is included in the Supplemental Response Definitions section.
Pharmacokinetic Study
Pixantrone was formulated in sterile 0.9% NaCl and administered at 30mg/kg intravenously (0.1ml/10g of body weight). Three mice were used per timepoint: 0, 10, 30min, 1, 2, 6, and 24hr. Blood specimens (0.8–1ml) were obtained at sacrifice in sodium heparin, rapidly centrifuged (4°C) and stored at −20°C. See the Supplemental Methods for details of the pixantrone assay methodology.
Statistical Methods
The exact log-rank test, as implemented using Proc StatXact for SAS®, was used to compare event-free survival distributions between treatment and control groups. P-values were two-sided and were not adjusted for multiple comparisons given the exploratory nature of the studies.
Drugs and Formulation
Pixantrone was provided to the Pediatric Preclinical Testing Program by Cell Therapeutics, Inc., through the Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program (NCI). Pixantrone was formulated in sterile saline and stored for up to 7 days at 4°C, protected from light. Pixantrone was administered intravenously at 7.5 mg/kg to mice using a q4days x 3 schedule. Pixantrone was provided in coded vials for blinded testing.
RESULTS
In vitro testing
Pixantrone was tested against the PPTP’s in vitro cell line panel at concentrations ranging from 3.0 nM to 30 μM using the PPTP’s standard 96 hour exposure period. The median relative IC50 (rIC50) value for the PPTP cell lines was 54 nM, with a range from <3 nM (CHLA-9) to 1033 nM (Rh18) (Table I). Observed Ymin values approached 0% for all cell lines at the highest concentrations tested. The median rIC50 values were lowest for the Ewing sarcoma panel (14 nM) and highest for the rhabdomyosarcoma panel (412 nM).
Table I.
In vitro activity of pixantrone against PPTP cell lines.
| Cell Line | Histotype | rIC50 (nM) | Panel rIC50 /Line rIC50 | Ymin (Observed) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RD | Rhabdomyosarcoma | 145 | 0.4 | 0.00 |
| Rh41 | Rhabdomyosarcoma | 679 | 0.1 | 0.00 |
| Rh18 | Rhabdomyosarcoma | 1033 | 0.1 | 0.00 |
| Rh30 | Rhabdomyosarcoma | 140 | 0.4 | 0.00 |
| BT-12 | Rhabdoid | 67 | 0.8 | 0.00 |
| CHLA-266 | Rhabdoid | 31 | 1.7 | 0.08 |
| TC-71 | Ewing sarcoma | 56 | 1.0 | 0.00 |
| CHLA-9 | Ewing sarcoma | <3 | 18.6 | 0.00 |
| CHLA-10 | Ewing sarcoma | 12 | 4.4 | 0.00 |
| CHLA-258 | Ewing sarcoma | 15 | 3.6 | 0.00 |
| SJ-GBM2 | Glioblastoma | 384 | 0.1 | 0.00 |
| NB-1643 | Neuroblastoma | 64 | 0.8 | 0.14 |
| NB-EBc1 | Neuroblastoma | 60 | 0.9 | 0.01 |
| CHLA-90 | Neuroblastoma | 382 | 0.1 | 0.01 |
| CHLA-136 | Neuroblastoma | 51 | 1.0 | 0.00 |
| NALM-6 | ALL | 28 | 1.9 | 0.00 |
| COG-LL-317 | ALL | 25 | 2.2 | 0.00 |
| RS4;11 | ALL | 29 | 1.9 | 0.00 |
| MOLT-4 | ALL | 21 | 2.6 | 0.00 |
| CCRF-CEM (1) | ALL | 49 | 1.1 | 0.00 |
| CCRF-CEM (2) | ALL | 29 | 1.9 | 0.00 |
| Kasumi-1 | AML | 146 | 0.4 | 0.00 |
| Karpas-299 | ALCL | 166 | 0.3 | 0.00 |
| Ramos-RA1 | NHL | 47 | 1.1 | 0.00 |
| Median | 54 | 1.0 | 0.00 | |
| Minimum | <3 | 0.1 | 0.00 | |
| Maximum | 1033 | 18.6 | 0.14 |
In vivo testing
Pixantrone was tested against eight PPTP solid tumor xenografts using a dose of 7.5 mg/kg administered intravenously q4d x 3. This dose was based on toxicity testing in non-tumored SCID mice. The planned treatment and observation period was 6 weeks. Toxicity was not observed in either treated or control groups at the 7.5 mg/kg dose. Eight of 8 tested xenograft models were considered evaluable for efficacy. Complete details of testing are provided in Supplemental Table I including total numbers of mice, number of mice that died (or were otherwise excluded), numbers of mice with events and average times to event, tumor growth delay, as well as numbers of responses and T/C values.
Pixantrone induced significant differences in event free survival (EFS) distribution compared to control in 25% (2 of 8) of the evaluable solid tumor xenografts, Table II. Pixantrone induced tumor growth inhibition meeting criteria for intermediate EFS T/C activity in 12.5% (1 of 8) evaluable solid tumor xenografts. An objective response (KT-10, Wilms tumor) was observed in 1 of 8 solid tumor xenografts.
Table II.
Summary of in vivo activity of pixantrone
| Xenograft Line | Histology | Median Time to Event | P-value | EFS T/C | Median Final RTV | T/C | T/C Activity | EFS Activity | Response Activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KT-10 | Wilms Tumor | > EP | <0.001 | > 4.2 | 0.9 | 0.05 | High | High | CR |
| KT-13 | Wilms Tumor | 12.9 | 0.889 | 1.0 | >4 | 0.94 | Low | Low | PD1 |
| SK-NEP-1 | Ewing Sarcoma | 11.9 | 0.125 | 1.1 | >4 | 0.98 | Low | Low | PD1 |
| EW8 | Ewing Sarcoma | 11.7 | 0.598 | 1.0 | >4 | 0.90 | Low | Low | PD1 |
| CHLA258 | Ewing Sarcoma | 10.5 | 0.430 | 1.0 | >4 | 0.85 | Low | Low | PD1 |
| Rh28 | Rhabdomyosarcoma | 16.9 | 0.201 | 1.3 | >4 | 0.72 | Low | Low | PD1 |
| Rh30 | Rhabdomyosarcoma | 18.8 | 0.842 | 0.9 | >4 | 1.11 | Low | Low | PD1 |
| Rh36 | Rhabdomyosarcoma | 13.3 | 0.003 | 1.9 | >4 | 0.63 | Low | Low | PD2 |
Tumor Volume T/C value: Relative tumor volumes (RTV) for control (C) and treatment (T) mice were calculated at day 21 or when all mice in the control and treated groups still had measurable tumor volumes (if less than 21 days). The T/C value is the mean RTV for the treatment group divided by the mean RTV for the control group. High activity = T/C ≤ 0.15; Intermediate activity = T/C ≤ 0.45 but > 0.15; and Low activity = T/C > 0.45. 2 Objective response measures are described in detail in the Supplemental Response Definitions. PD1 = progressive disease with EFS T/C ≤ 1.5, and PD2 = progressive disease with EFS T/C > 1.5. 3EFS T/C values = the ratio of the median time to event of the treatment group and the median time to event of the respective control group. High activity requires: a) an EFS T/C > 2; b) a significant difference in EFS distributions, and c) a net reduction in median tumor volume for animals in the treated group at the end of treatment as compared to at treatment initiation. Intermediate activity = criteria a) and b) above, but not having a net reduction in median tumor volume for treated animals at the end of the study. Low activity = EFS T/C < 2.
Pharmacokinetic analysis
Pixantrone pharmacokinetics was determined following a single dose of pixantrone (30 mg/kg) administered intravenously. The bioanalytical method for pharmacokinetic analysis for pixantrone was validated in the range 50 to 2500 ng/mL. The concentrations at 24 hours, though below the quantitation limit of the method, were well quantifiable and were characterized by low inter-animal variability (%CV = 14%), and hence were included in the pharmacokinetic analysis. (Supplemental Figure 1). Plasma pharmacokinetic parameters are provided in Supplemental Table II and include Cmax of 5690 nM, AUC0-t(last) of 13600 nM*h and AUC0-∞ of 14000 nM*h.
DISCUSSION
The aza-anthracenedione pixantrone was synthesized with the intent to reduce the cardiotoxicity of anthracycline derivatives such as doxorubicin and mitoxantrone [12]. It was shown preclinically to have little or no cardiotoxicity in mice compared to those treated with doxorubicin and mitoxantrone [2]. Multiple mechanisms including intercalative interaction with DNA, induction of DNA strand breaks, and interaction with topoisomerase II may be responsible for the cytotoxicity of pixantrone [4–8]
Pixantrone exhibited potent cytotoxic activity in vitro against the PPTP cell lines, with a median relative IC50 (rIC50) value for the PPTP cell lines of 54 nM. The continuous exposure for 96 hours likely explains the lower rIC50 values for the PPTP cell lines compared to prior reports of the in vitro activity of pixantrone that employed shorter exposure periods.
Pixantrone administered at 7.5 mg/kg q4d x 3 did not induce toxicity in treated mice, and its in vivo activity was modest. A complete response was observed in the Wilms tumor model KT-10, and a statistically significant delay in time to event was measured in Rh36 (embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma). Pixantrone did not significantly inhibit tumor growth for any of the three Ewing sarcoma xenografts.
The dose-normalized systemic AUC for pixantrone obtained for the CB17-SCID mice used by the PPTP to study pixantrone was compared to that observed in humans (Supplemental Table III). Pixantrone systemic exposure in humans varies according to dose administered, ranging from 3680 nM·h for 84 mg/m2 to 8741 nM*h for 180 mg/m2 [13–15]. Using these published data and normalizing to the dose and schedule used in the phase 3 trial of pixantrone in NHL [16], the estimated AUC per course is 11171 – 17866 nM·h, similar to the systemic exposure per course observed for SCID mice by the PPTP (10500 nM·h).
In summary, pixantrone showed tumor regressing activity against a Wilms tumor xenograft, but not against 6 pediatric sarcoma models. Because doxorubicin is poorly tolerated by SCID mice [17,18], it is not possible to compare the activity of pixantrone to that of doxorubicin against the PPTP pediatric solid tumor models.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by NO1-CM-42216, and CA21765, from the National Cancer Institute and used pixantrone supplied by Cell Therapeutics, Inc. In addition to the authors this paper represents work contributed by the following: Sherry Ansher, Edward Favours, Melissa Sammons, Jianrong Wu, and Jian Zhang.
Footnotes
Conflict of interest statement: Cecilia Allievi is an independent consultant contracted with Cell Therapeutics, the other authors consider that there are no actual or perceived conflicts of interest.
References
- 1.Denny WA, Wakelin LP. Kinetics of the binding of mitoxantrone, ametantrone and analogues to DNA: relationship with binding mode and anti-tumour activity. Anti-cancer drug design. 1990;5(2):189–200. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Cavalletti E, Crippa L, Mainardi P, et al. Pixantrone (BBR 2778) has reduced cardiotoxic potential in mice pretreated with doxorubicin: comparative studies against doxorubicin and mitoxantrone. Investigational new drugs. 2007;25(3):187–195. doi: 10.1007/s10637-007-9037-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Salvatorelli E, Menna P, Paz OG, et al. The novel anthracenedione, pixantrone, lacks redox activity and inhibits doxorubicinol formation in human myocardium: insight to explain the cardiac safety of pixantrone in Doxorubicin-treated patients. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2013;344(2):467–478. doi: 10.1124/jpet.112.200568. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.de Isabella P, Palumbo M, Sissi C, et al. Physicochemical properties, cytotoxic activity and topoisomerase II inhibition of 2,3-diaza-anthracenediones. Biochem Pharmacol. 1997;53(2):161–169. doi: 10.1016/s0006-2952(96)00646-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Zwelling LA, Mayes J, Altschuler E, et al. Activity of two novel anthracene-9,10-diones against human leukemia cells containing intercalator-sensitive or -resistant forms of topoisomerase II. Biochem Pharmacol. 1993;46(2):265–271. doi: 10.1016/0006-2952(93)90413-q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Hazlehurst LA, Krapcho AP, Hacker MP. Comparison of aza-anthracenedione-induced DNA damage and cytotoxicity in experimental tumor cells. Biochem Pharmacol. 1995;50(7):1087–1094. doi: 10.1016/0006-2952(95)00246-v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Evison BJ, Mansour OC, Menta E, et al. Pixantrone can be activated by formaldehyde to generate a potent DNA adduct forming agent. Nucleic acids research. 2007;35(11):3581–3589. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkm285. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Evison BJ, Chiu F, Pezzoni G, et al. Formaldehyde-activated Pixantrone is a monofunctional DNA alkylator that binds selectively to CpG and CpA doublets. Molecular pharmacology. 2008;74(1):184–194. doi: 10.1124/mol.108.045625. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Frgala T, Kalous O, Proffitt RT, et al. A fluorescence microplate cytotoxicity assay with a 4-log dynamic range that identifies synergistic drug combinations. Mol Cancer Ther. 2007;6(3):886–897. doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-04-0331. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Kang MH, Smith MA, Morton CL, et al. National Cancer Institute Pediatric Preclinical Testing Program: Model description for in vitro cytotoxicity testing. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2011;56(2):239–249. doi: 10.1002/pbc.22801. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Houghton PJ, Morton CL, Tucker C, et al. The Pediatric Preclinical Testing Program: description of models and early testing results. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2007;49(7):928–940. doi: 10.1002/pbc.21078. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Beggiolin G, Crippa L, Menta E, et al. Bbr 2778, an aza-anthracenedione endowed with preclinical anticancer activity and lack of delayed cardiotoxicity. Tumori. 2001;87(6):407–416. doi: 10.1177/030089160108700611. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Borchmann P, Schnell R, Knippertz R, et al. Phase I study of BBR 2778, a new aza-anthracenedione, in advanced or refractory non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. Ann Oncol. 2001;12(5):661–667. doi: 10.1023/a:1011139016294. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Dawson LK, Jodrell DI, Bowman A, et al. A clinical phase I and pharmacokinetic study of BBR 2778, a novel anthracenedione analogue, administered intravenously, 3 weekly. Eur J Cancer. 2000;36(18):2353–2359. doi: 10.1016/s0959-8049(00)00342-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Faivre S, Raymond E, Boige V, et al. A phase I and pharmacokinetic study of the novel aza-anthracenedione compound BBR 2778 in patients with advanced solid malignancies. Clin Cancer Res. 2001;7(1):43–50. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Pettengell R, Coiffier B, Narayanan G, et al. Pixantrone dimaleate versus other chemotherapeutic agents as a single-agent salvage treatment in patients with relapsed or refractory aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma: a phase 3, multicentre, open-label, randomised trial. Lancet Oncol. 2012;13(7):696–706. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(12)70212-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Lee VW, Wang Y, Qin X, et al. Adriamycin nephropathy in severe combined immunodeficient (SCID) mice. Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association. 2006;21(11):3293–3298. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfl413. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Papeta N, Zheng Z, Schon EA, et al. Prkdc participates in mitochondrial genome maintenance and prevents Adriamycin-induced nephropathy in mice. The Journal of clinical investigation. 2010;120(11):4055–4064. doi: 10.1172/JCI43721. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
