Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Feb 12.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Med Qual. 2013 Aug 12;29(4):308–314. doi: 10.1177/1062860613498112

Table 4.

Multivariable Regression Results for Predicting LDL Cholesterol Control in 2010, by Baseline Patient Control Status

Black Race, OR
(95% CI)
No LLD at baseline
OR (95% CI)
Regimen Increased,
OR (95% CI)
Regimen Decreased,
OR (95% CI)
Uncontrolled in 2008 Model A 0.53 (0.36 – 0.78)
Model B 0.52 (0.35 – 0.76) 0.59 (0.39 – 0.89) 1.60 (1.03 – 2.50) 0.53 (0.28 – 0.99)
Model C 0.52 (0.34 – 0.80) 0.67 (0.43 – 1.05) 1.59 (1.01 – 2.53) 0.62 (0.32 – 1.22)

Controlled in 2008 Model A 0.47 (0.32 – 0.69)
Model B 0.49 (0.34 – 0.73) 0.56 (0.33 – 0.96) 1.13 (0.66 – 1.94) 0.39 (0.23 – 0.65)
Model C 0.46 (0.30 – 0.70) 0.54 (0.31 – 0.96) 1.11 (0.62 – 1.98) 0.42 (0.24 – 0.72)

Model A: unadjusted

Model B: adjusted for lipid-lowering drug (LLD) at baseline and changes in treatment. Regimen increased includes addition of any LLD or increase in dosage of current LLD. Regimen decreased includes removal of any LLD or decrease in dosage of current LLD.

Model C: adjusted for variables in model B and patient characteristics (gender, age, neighborhood education, ischemic vascular disease, Dartmouth Atlas comorbidities, number of general medicine visits, insurance status)