Table 5.

PCA results depicting variables associated with socioeconomic status and level of stressors and resources in the SIP.

	Household economic status	Family context	Socio-economic status	Social resources	Ties support	Life events
Economic stressorsa	0.84	0.00	0.03	−0.12	−0.06	0.24
Economic resourcesa	0.82	−0.11	0.02	−0.01	−0.01	0.08
Housing stressorsa	0.60	0.09	−0.03	0.12	0.16	−0.30
Couple stressorsa	−0.02	0.79	0.12	0.05	0.11	0.15
Couple resourcesa	0.18	0.64	−0.05	0.24	−0.21	0.06
Child stressorsa	−0.27	0.58	−0.01	0.11	0.29	0.14
Negative life eventsa	0.13	0.42	0.22	−0.20	0.24	−0.41
Overcrowdingb	−0.19	0.15	0.79	−0.13	−0.21	−0.03
Housing conditionsb	0.12	−0.10	0.67	0.05	−0.05	−0.27
Parents occupation levelb	0.18	0.22	0.56	0.05	−0.05	0.09
Parents education levelb	0.11	−0.37	0.47	0.26	0.24	0.22
Child resourcesa	0.06	0.10	0.03	0.72	−0.04	−0.02
Social resourcesa	−0.17	0.00	0.11	0.70	0.06	0.04
Family resourcesa	0.05	0.21	−0.15	0.67	−0.09	−0.15
Family stressorsa	0.06	0.04	−0.14	−0.01	0.75	−0.11
Social stressorsa	−0.04	0.08	−0.07	−0.04	0.68	0.09
Positive life eventsa	0.17	0.24	−0.05	−0.10	0.04	0.87

n = 221.

^aVariables from the LISRES inventory.

^bVariables from the Socioeconomic Status Scale.

Bold text indicates variables loading on each factor. These six factors were the only ones with eigenvalues larger than 1 in the correlation matrix, and the Scree plot also suggested the six-factor solution.