Skip to main content
. 2014 Jan 7;106(2):djt376. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djt376

Table 3.

Univariate and multivariable analyses* of the 11-protein signature for its prognostic value (n = 63)

Test set (multicenter cohort) Metastasis-free survival Breast cancer–related survival
Univariate analysis Multivariable analysis Univariate analysis Multivariable analysis
Variables Hazard ratio (95% CI) P Hazard ratio (95% CI) P Hazard ratio (95% CI) P Hazard ratio (95% CI) P
Age, y 0.99 (0.95 to 1.02) .42 1.02 (0.96 to 1.07) .59 0.99 (0.95 to 1.03) .68 1.02 (0.96 to 1.08) .61
Menopausal status, post- vs premenopausal 0.60 (0.24 to 1.48) .27 0.41 (0.08 to 1.96) .26 0.71 (0.27 to 1.89) .49 0.50 (0.09 to 2.66) .42
Tumor size, >2cm & unknown vs ≤2 cm 0.74 (0.30 to 1.83) .51 0.70 (0.28 to 1.75) .45 0.94 (0.34 to 2.60) .91 0.93 (0.34 to 2.58) .89
Tumor grade†
 Grade 3 vs 1 and 2 2.79 (0.64 to 12.22) .17 3.22 (0.71 to 14.52) .13 2.09 (0.47 to 9.33) .34 2.31 (0.50 to 10.75) .29
 Grade unknown vs 1 and 2 2.61 (0.37 to 18.55) .34 2.70 (0.37 to 19.80) .33 2.67 (0.37 to 19.05) .33 2.88 (0.39 to 21.48) .30
11-protein signature, predicted poor vs good 13.15 (3.03 to 57.07) .001 12.45 (2.67 to 58.11) .001 22.78 (3.00 to 173.08) .003 36.08 (4.00 to 325.67) .001

* Univariate and multivariable analyses were performed based on Cox regression model. All statistical tests were two-sided. CI = confidence interval

† Tumor grade classification according to Bloom and Richardson scoring system (34).