Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Sep;122(3):539–545. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31829efbff

Table 1.

Prevalence of Urinary Incontinence Alone, Fecal Incontinence Alone, and Dual Incontinence, Overall and Stratified by Race and Age

Urinary Incontinence Alone Fecal Incontinence Alone Dual Incontinence

Stratification variable n Cases % (95% CI) Cases % (95% CI) Cases % (95% CI)
All women 64,396 24,341 37.8 (37.4–38.2) 2,786 4.3 (4.2–4.5) 4,660 7.2 (7.0–7.4)
Race
 White 62,777 23,855 38.0 (37.6–38.4) 2,721 4.3 (4.2–4.5) 4,584 7.3 (7.1–7.5)
 Black 929 257 27.7 (24.8–30.7)* 27 2.9 (1.9–4.2)* 29 3.1 (2.1–4.5)*
 Asian 494 142 28.7 (24.8–33.0)* 34 6.9 (4.8–9.5)* 31 6.3 (4.3–8.8)
Age, years
 62–69 24,077 7,897 32.8 (32.2–33.4) 1,077 4.5 (4.2–4.7) 1,303 5.4 (5.1–5.7)
 70–79 27,614 11,038 40.0 (39.4–40.6) 1,123 4.1 (3.8–4.3) 2,012 7.3 (7.0–7.6)
 80–87 12,705 5,406 42.6 (41.7–43.4) 586 4.6 (4.3–5.0) 1,345 10.6 (10.1–11.1)

CI, confidence interval.

*

Statistically significant difference in prevalence compared with white women (P<0.05).

Statistically significant difference in prevalence compared with women aged 62–69 years (P<0.05).