Skip to main content
. 2014 Mar 1;32(3):121–129. doi: 10.1089/pho.2013.3663

Table 2.

Resistance Phenotypes Resulting from Interpretation of MIC Values

  No. of isolates  
Relevant phenotypes and/or genotypes MRSA MSSA Total
Resistance to rifamycines 83 11 94
Resistance to quinolones 216 21 237
 Partially resistant 83 10 93
 Resistant 133 11 144
Resistance to fusidic acid 74 5 79
Resistance to tetracyclines 127 40 167
Resistance to β-lactamsa 265 121 386
 Modification of PBP (mecA) 264   264
 Acquired penicillinase 1 121 122
Resistance to oxazolidinone 1 2 3
Resistance to aminoglycosides 265 159 424
 Resistant to KAN (aph[3’]-III) 173 144 317
 Resistant to KAN TOB GEN (ant[2]-Ia) 92 15 107
Resistance to trimethoprim/sulfonamids 7   7
Resistance to macrolides/lincosamides 258 156 414
 MLSB induciblea,b 11 16 27
 MLSB constitutiveb 195 13 208
 MSBb 3 3 6
 Other 49 124 173
a

Resistance mechanisms detected by VITEK 2.

b

Resistance mechanisms detected by D test.

MIC, minimum inhibitory concentration; MRSA, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus; MSSA, methicillin-sensitive S. aureus; PBP, penicillin-binding protein; GEN, gentamicin; KAN, kanamycin; TOB, tobramycin; MLSB, macrolides, lincosamides, streptogramins B.