Skip to main content
. 2014 Mar 13;10(3):e1004229. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1004229

Table 2. Top 30 Amish-specific putative damaging exonic missense variants by prevalence in affected individuals.

Chr. Position Ref Alt dbSNP 138 Gene #BP1 # Well 1000G freq. EVS freq.
chr8 39521389 T C rs147445686 ADAM18 13 8 . 0.0023
chr8 37692704 G A rs113270504 GPR124 13 9 0.011 0.017
chr6 42146043 A G rs200275941 GUCA1A 12 7 . .
chr1 40020020 C A rs79473113 LOC728448 10 8 . .
chrX 65835841 A G rs73221529 EDA2R 10 10 0.0024 0.007
chr19 14164629 C T rs75841596 PALM3 9 11 0.017 .
chr2 61413761 C A rs200746889 AHSA2 8 1 . 0.00015
chr8 120430415 G A Novel NOV 8 5 . .
chr9 5164252 C T Novel INSL6 8 7 . .
chr1 1387499 T A rs199583997 ATAD3C 8 8 . 0.0018
chr18 76335864 G A rs149637223 LOC100132713 8 10 . .
chr1 27661952 C T rs150461998 TMEM222 8 10 0.0096 0.009
chr16 25238420 G A rs117255669 AQP8 7 1 0.0087 0.017
chr19 9067237 T G rs201826382 MUC16 7 3 . .
chr2 96907615 A C Novel LOC285033 7 3 . .
chr16 48204130 C T rs60681475 ABCC11 7 4 0.0078 0.011
chr6 84925066 A G rs147915749 KIAA1009 7 4 0.00091 0.003
chr6 84904604 G C rs17790493 KIAA1009 7 4 0.0179 0.019
chr19 9059827 A G rs76869876 MUC16 7 4 0.0046 0.006
chr3 172365793 C T Novel NCEH1 7 5 . .
chr11 48267242 G A rs145684951 OR4X2 7 5 . 0.0002
chr2 163302901 C T rs78247304 KCNH7 7 5 . .
chr11 55798414 G T rs142890517 OR5AS1 7 5 . 7.70E-05
chr17 3195777 A T rs149826123 OR3A1 7 6 0.0037 0.004
chr7 120911438 G A rs138155176 C7orf58 7 6 0.00092 0.0017
chr22 26937139 C T rs117701840 TPST2 7 6 0.0041 0.005
chr12 110566907 A G rs34684319 IFT81 7 6 0.014 0.0145
chr10 75860740 A G rs71579374 VCL 7 7 0.00046 0.0009
chr1 1269071 A G rs376489341 TAS1R3 7 8 . 7.70E-05
chr19 12429782 G A rs112896133 ZNF563 7 8 0.0041 0.0088

Exonic missense variants, identified in 50 subjects with WGS, were filtered by <2% allele frequency in 1000 Genomes, EVS and 54 HapMap WGS. Functional impact was assessed by consensus of Polyphen2 and SIFT.