Skip to main content
. 2014 Mar 13;9(3):e91172. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0091172

Table 1. Comparison of canFam2.0 and canFam3.1.

Property canFam2.0 canFam3.1
Coverage of euchromatic portion of genome (%) 99.2 99.6
Portion of assembly in “certified regions” (%) 99.5 99.8
Contiguity: gaps per Mb 12 6
ENCODE regions High-quality draft 98% Finished