Table 1.
Variable | Percentages (95% confidence interval) |
---|---|
Male | 85.2 (65.0, 94.7) |
Race | |
White | 83.3 (70.0, 91.5) |
Black | 8.8 (4.4, 16.6) |
Other race | 7.9 (2.4, 22.6) |
Parent or guardian household income | |
Up to $25,000 | 7.7 (3.7, 15.3) |
$25,001–$50,000 | 16.3 (7.9, 30.2) |
$50,001–$75,000 | 38.7 (25.7, 53.5) |
More than $75,000 | 37.3 (22.2, 55.3) |
How well youth converses | |
No ability/lot of trouble | 7.7 (4.0, 14.3) |
Little trouble | 66.2 (52.9, 77.3) |
No trouble | 26.2 (16.1, 39.5) |
Had a STEM major | 40.8 (25.8, 57.9) |
Dependent measures | |
Disability identification (youth considers self to have a disability or special need) | 69.4 (57.6, 79.1) |
Self-efficacy indicators | |
(1) “You can handle most things that come your way” | |
Not at all like me | 4.3 (2.1, 8.5) |
A little like me | 54.8 (42.1, 66.9) |
Very much like me | 40.9 (29.8, 53.1) |
(2) “You know how to get information you need” | |
Not at all like me | 2.7 (1.2, 6.1) |
A little like me | 25.2 (14.9, 39.3) |
Very much like me | 72.1 (58.4, 82.7) |
(3) “You can get school staff and other adults to listen to you” | |
Not at all like me | 5.5 (2.8, 10.6) |
A little like me | 22.8 (14.4, 34.0) |
Very much like me | 71.7 (60.1, 81.0) |
Source: National Longitudinal Transition Study 2.
Notes: number of multiply imputed data sets = 50. Weighted to population levels. Variances adjusted for sampling method.