Table 1. Characteristics of participants stratified by motor subscales of FIM at admission.
| Motor subscales of FIM at admission ≦28 (n = 427) | |||||||
 No additional training |
 Self-initiated traning |
 Training by ward staff |
 Dual training |
p value† | multiple | ||
| (n = 62) | (n = 7) | (n = 203) | (n = 155) | comparison‡ | |||
| Sex | Male | 33(14.2%) | 2(0.9%) | 113(48.7%) | 84(36.2%) | 0.59 | |
| Female | 29(14.9%) | 5(2.6%) | 90(46.2%) | 71(36.4%) | |||
| Type fo stroke | CI | 38(14.7%) | 3(1.2%) | 132(51.2%) | 85(32.9%) | 0.02 | |
| CH | 17(13.0) | 2(1.5%) | 50(38.2%) | 62(47.3%) | |||
| SAH etc. | 7(18.4%) | 2(5.3%) | 21(55.3%) | 8(21.1%) | |||
| Informal care | NIC | 17(18.5%) | 2(2.2%) | 42(45.7%) | 31(33.7%) | 0.27 | |
| resources | OIC | 20(13.7%) | 4(2.7%) | 64(43.8%) | 58(39.7%) | ||
| MTIC | 19(10.6%) | 1(0.6%) | 94(52.5%) | 65(36.3%) | |||
| Age | 74.5±9.9 | 73.0±8.0 | 75.3±9.2 | 69.4±11.8 | <0.001 |
 <
|
|
| Days after onset at admission | 41.1±25.0 | 48.6±47.3 | 39.9±21.2 | 30.9±16.4 | <0.001 |
 <
|
|
| Motor subscales of FIM at admission 29∼56 (n = 418) | |||||||
 No additional training
|
 Self-initiated traning
|
 Training by ward staff
|
 Dual training
|
p value † | multiple | ||
| (n = 63) | (n = 16) | (n = 71) | (n = 268) | comparison ‡ | |||
| Sex | Male | 50(18.9%) | 13(4.9%) | 43(16.2%) | 159(60.0%) | 0.01 | |
| Female | 13(8.5%) | 3(2.0%) | 28(18.3%) | 109(71.2%) | |||
| Type of stroke | CI | 27(10.2%) | 11(4.1%) | 58(21.8%) | 170(63.9%) | <0.001 | |
| CH | 31(13.9%) | 2(0.9%) | 11(8.9%) | 79(64.2%) | |||
| SAH etc. | 5(17.2%) | 3(10.3%) | 2(6.9%) | 19(65.5%) | |||
| Informal care | NIC | 19(17.3%) | 6(5.5%) | 23(20.9%) | 62(57.3%) | 0.46 | |
| resources | OIC | 17(12.4%) | 4(2.9%) | 23(16.8%) | 93(67.9%) | ||
| MTIC | 26(15.7%) | 6(3.6%) | 23(13.9%) | 111(66.9%) | |||
| Age | 71.8±9.5 | 68.1±9.7 | 75.1±10.7 | 66.6±12.8 | <0.001 |
 <
|
|
| Days after onset at admission | 41.9±21.4 | 34.9±19.4 | 36.4±18.4 | 32.0±14.6 | <0.001 |
 <
|
|
| Motor subscales of FIM at admission 57≦ (n = 388) | |||||||
 No additional training
|
 Self-initiated traning
|
 Training by ward staff
|
 Dual training
|
p value † | multiple | ||
| (n = 45) | (n = 41) | (n = 22) | (n = 280) | comparison ‡ | |||
| Sex | Male | 23(9.3%) | 31(12.6%) | 13(5.3%) | 180(72.9%) | 0.12 | |
| Female | 22(15.6%) | 10(7.1%) | 9(6.4%) | 100(70.9%) | |||
| Type of stroke | CI | 28(11.2%) | 16(6.4%) | 16(6.4%) | 190(76.0%) | 0.003 | |
| CH | 9(9.8%) | 17(18.5%) | 2(2.2%) | 64(69.6%) | |||
| SAH etc. | 8(17.4%) | 8(17.4%) | 4(8.7%) | 26(56.5) | |||
| Informal care | NIC | 12(12.0%) | 13(13.0%) | 0(0.0%) | 75(75.0%) | 0.07 | |
| resources | OIC | 15(11.7%) | 13(10.2%) | 9(7.0%) | 91(71.1%) | ||
| MTIC | 16(10.6%) | 13(8.6%) | 12(7.9%) | 110(72.8%) | |||
| Age | 72.0±11.1 | 61.7±15.5 | 70.9±18.2 | 64.2±13.7 | <0.001 |
 <
|
|
| Days after onset at admission | 35.4±16.8 | 34.6±14.4 | 41.6±26.8 | 30.4±21.9 | 0.05 | ||
note:SAH = Subarachnoidal hemorrhage; CI = Cerebral infarction; CH = Cerebral hemorrhage; NIC = No informal caregivers; OIC = One informal caregiver; MTIC = More than two informal caregivers.
†
p value for one way analysis of variance.
‡
multiple comparison: digits refer to group numbers (Tukey multiple comparison procedure).