Table 3.
Resistance pattern of bacteria species used in the study.
| Isolate | AMP | AMC | CRO | CAZ | CN | CP | SXT | ERT | MEM |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A. baumannii (10) | 100.0% | 100.0% | 90.0% | 90.0% | 80.0% | 40.0% | 90.0% | 40.0% | 10.0% |
| C. freundii (15) | 100.0% | 100.0% | 60.0% | 80.0% | 80.0% | 26.7% | 86.7% | 13.3% | 0.0% |
| E. coli (56) | 100.0% | 100.0% | 84.0% | 82.1% | 73.2% | 44.6% | 96.4% | 19.6% | 8.9% |
| Enterobacter (5) | 100.0% | 100.0% | 20.0% | 40.0% | 60.0% | 20.0% | 100.0% | 20.0% | 0.0% |
| K. oxytoca (8) | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 62.5% | 100.0% | 12.5% | 0.0% |
| K. pneumoniae (68) | 100.0% | 98.5% | 84.0% | 79.4% | 83.8% | 33.8% | 97.1% | 16.2% | 1.5% |
| M. morganii (3) | 100.0% | 100.0% | 33.3% | 33.3% | 33.3% | 0.0% | 100.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| P. aeruginosa (41) | 100.0% | 97.5% | 73.2% | 53.7% | 31.7% | 17.1% | 92.7% | 56.1% | 19.5% |
| P. mirabilis (2) | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 50.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 50.0% | 0.0% |
| P. vulgaris (7) | 100.0% | 85.7% | 57.1% | 42.9% | 57.1% | 14.3% | 85.7% | 14.3% | 0.0% |
| S. marcescens (9) | 100.0% | 100.0% | 66.7% | 66.7% | 66.7% | 44.4% | 100.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Salmonella spp. (3) | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 0.0% | 100.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Total | 100.0% | 98.7% | 78.0% | 74.0% | 65.6% | 33.5% | 95.2% | 24.2% | 6.6% |
AMP, AMC, CAZ, CRO, CN, CIP, SXT, ERT, and MEM stand for ampicillin, amoxicillin/clavulanic acid, ceftazidime, gentamicin, ciprofloxacin, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, ertapenem, and meropenem, respectively.