Skip to main content
. 2012 Nov 7;37(4):216–224. doi: 10.1093/hsw/hls033

Table 3:

Feasibility Evaluation

Participants(n = 15) Family (n = 15)
Response Item n (%) n (%)
The sessions were the right length of time. 15 (100.0) 14 (93.3)
It was useful to have brochures, pamphlets, and other educational materials. 15 (100.0) 15 (100.0)
It was useful to learn how to access cancer information by telephone and the Internet. 15 (100.0) 15 (100.0)
It was useful to learn how families need to renegotiate their household kuleana (responsibility). 15 (100.0) 14 (93.3)
It was helpful to learn about communicating with my health care provider. 15 (100.0) 14 (93.3)
I appreciated attention to Hawaiian values in sessions. 15 (100.0) 15 (100.0)
I appreciated the use of Hawaiian practices. 14 (93.3) 13 (86.7)
Telephone, bulletin boards, and other materials were useful. 14 (100.0)a 15 (100.0)
It was helpful for the participant to choose the meeting place. 15 (100.0) 15 (100.0)
I felt comfortable with members of the research team. 15 (100.0) 15 (100.0)
Questions were clear and easy to understand. 14 (93.3) 15 (100.0)
I would recommend this project to other Native Hawaiians with cancer. 14 (100.0)a 15 (100.0)

Note: Response options ranged from 5 = strongly agree to 1 = strongly disagree. Shown are number of participants who agreed or strongly agreed with each statement. aOnly 14 answered.