Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Clin Psychol. 2013 Oct 2;70(4):303–312. doi: 10.1002/jclp.22050

Table 2.

Means and Standard Deviations on the Baseline Scores on the Scales and Two-Way ANOVA Results for Effects of “Group,” “Attendance” and the Interaction

Treatment
Control
Completers N = 63
M (SD)
None completers N = 74
M (SD)
Total N = 137
M (SD)
Completers N = 56
M (SD)
None completers N = 29
M (SD)
Total N = 85
M (SD)
Groupd
Attendancee
Group × attendancef
F P
ηp2
F P
ηp2
F P
ηp2
ISMI – Total Scale (1–4) 2.08 (0.55) 2.20 (0.55) 2.14 (0.55) 2.09 (0.54) 2.08 (0.61) 2.08 (0.56) 0.54a .465 .002 0.42a .517 .002 0.63a .428 .003
ISMI-Alienation 2.32 (0.66) 2.50 (0.68) 2.42 (0.67) 2.29 (0.65) 2.27 (0.75) 2.28 (0.68) 1.93a .166 .009 0.74a .392 .003 1.14a .288 .005
ISMI-Stereotype endorsement 1.80 (0.55) 1.89 (0.47) 1.85 (0.51) 1.86 (0.49) 1.87 (0.63) 1.87 (0.54) 0.09a .769 .000 0.50a .481 .002 0.29a .589 .001
ISMI-Social withdrawal 2.13 (0.72) 2.21 (0.73) 2.17 (0.73) 2.10 (0.69) 2.00 (0.71) 2.07 (0.69) 1.42a .235 .006 0.01a .938 .000 0.79a .375 .004
ISMI-Discrimination experience 2.14 (0.66) 2.25 (0.74) 2.20 (0.70) 2.16 (0.67) 2.24 (0.72) 2.18 (0.68) 0.00a .959 .000 0.88a .349 .004 0.02a .901 .000
MANSA (1–7) 4.51 (1.11) 4.20 (1.11) 4.34 (1.11) 4.44 (1.13) 3.94 (1.13) 4.27 (1.15) 1.03b .312 .005 6.59b .011 .030 0.36b .550 .002
Hope-Total Scale (1–8) 5.83 (1.42) 5.22 (1.66) 5.50 (1.58) 5.70 (1.30) 5.53 (1.87) 5.64 (1.51) 0.16c .692 .001 3.15c .077 .014 0.97c .326 .004
Hope-Pathway 6.03 (1.35) 5.31 (1.80) 5.64 (1.64) 5.79 (1.36) 5.54 (1.98) 5.70 (1.59) 0.00c .976 .000 4.44c .036 .020 1.05c .308 .005
Hope-Agency 5.63 (1.67) 5.13 (1.78) 5.36 (1.74) 5.61 (1.63) 5.50 (2.09) 5.57 (1.79) 0.47c .496 .002 1.46c .229 .007 0.62c .431 .003
RSE (1–4) 2.98 (0.59) 2.75 (0.48) 2.85 (0.54) 2.96 (0.57) 3.07 (0.51) 2.99 (0.55) 3.67b .057 .017 0.59b .444 .003 4.75b .030 .022

Note. ISMI = The Internalized Stigma of Mental Illness Scale; MANSA = The Manchester Short Assessment of Quality of Life; RES = Rosenberg Self-Esteem; M = mean; SD = standard deviation; df = degree of freedom. Two-way analysis of variance results for effects of group, attendance, and the interaction.

a

df = (1,218).

b

df = (1,216).

c

df = (1,215).

d

Differences between the control and treatment groups.

e

Differences between those who did and didn’t complete Time 2 assessments.

f

Interaction between “groups” and “attendance”.