Table 2.

Dobutamine stress CMR (summary studies)

Study	n	CAD Prevalence (%)	Sensitivity (%)	Specificity (%)	PPV	NPV
Pennell et al35	40	98	62	100	100	52
Pennell et al36	25	88	91	100	100	60
van Rugge et al37	45	82	81	100	100	53
Baer et al38	32	100	84	NA	NA	NA
van Rugge et al39	39	85	91	83	97	63
Nagel et al40	172	63	86	86	91	78
Hundley et al41	41	85	83	83	97	45
Schalla et al17,‡	22	73	81	83	93	63
Paetsch et al42	79	67	89	80	91	77
Paetsch et al47,*	150	51	78	87	87	79
Wahl et al43	160	74	89	84	94	73
Jahnke et al44	40	70	89	83	93	77
Gebker et al45	455	69	85	82	91	71
Korosoglou et al33,†	80	58	98	85	90	97
Meta-analysis
Nandalur et al46	735	70.5	83	86	93	68

Abbreviations: NA, not available; NPV, negative predictive value; PPV, positive predictive value.

^*Mean values reported from 4 independent readers.

^†Strain-encoded cardiac magnetic resonance imaging used.

^‡Real-time cardiac magnetic resonance imaging used.