Table 3.

Stress perfusion CMR (summary studies)

Study	n	CAD Prevalence (%)	Sensitivity (%)	Specificity (%)	PPV	NPV
Nagel et al67	84	51	88	90	90	90
Ishida et al68	104	74	90	85	95	74
Doyle et al69,¶	184	14	57	78	30	92
Plein et al 22,§	68	82	88	83	96	59
Takase et al70	102	74	93	85	95	81
Giang et al65,†	80	65	93	75	87	86
Plein et al71	92	72	88	82	90	79
Klem et al59	92	40	89	87	83	92
Pilz et al72	171	66	96	83	92	92
Merkle et al73	228	75	93	86	95	80
Schwitter et al74,†	225	77	85	67	89	58
Gebker et al75	101	69	90	71	88	76
Klem et al76,†,‡	136	27	84	88	72	94
Thomas et al77,║	60	47	93	84	84	93
Meta-analysis
Nandalur et al46	1183	57.4	91	81	87	87
Hamon et al78	2125	57	89	80	85	85

Abbreviations: CAD, coronary artery disease; NPV, negative predictive value; PPV, positive predictive value.

^†Multicenter studies.

^‡Study population, women only.

^§Patients presenting to ED with suspected ACS.

^║3.0 T and myocardial tagging.

^¶Study population, women only Women’s Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation (WISE) study. Myocardial flow reserve index was used to assess for ischemia.