Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Mar 14.
Published in final edited form as: Heart Fail Rev. 2011 Jul;16(4):381–395. doi: 10.1007/s10741-010-9201-7

Fig. 7.

Fig. 7

Cardiac MR compared to cardiac CT to assess for viable myocardium. Panel a The percent signal intensity (SI) and the contrast noise ratio (CNR) was higher with CE-MR (contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance image) than CEMDCT (contrast-enhanced multidetector CT). The images in panel b illustrate the same findings. Images adapted and reproduced with permission from Gerber et al. [65]