Table 1.
Technique | Imaging finding | Criteria for viability |
---|---|---|
Echocardiography | ||
Left ventricular wall thickness Inotropic contractile reserve |
>6 mm [9] Biphasic response better predictive accuracy versus monophasic response [14] |
|
Contrast echocardiography perfusion imaging Strain and strain rate imaging |
No perfusion defect [16] Global left ventricular strain of −13.7% on automated function imaging [13] |
|
Cardiac MRI | ||
Left ventricular wall thickness Inotropic contractile reserve LGE |
>5.5 mm [22] Improved contractility [22] <25% transmural LGE 26–50% transmural LGE intermediate recovery [31] |
|
Radionuclide techniques | ||
SPECT | ||
Thallium-201 | Perfusion Redistribution |
>50% peak levels [38, 39] >50% peak levels [38, 39] |
Technetium-99m | Perfusion | >50% peak levels [39] |
Nitrate-enhanced perfusion imaging | Perfusion | >50% peak levels [36] |
Low-dose dobutamine | Contractile reserve | Improvement in regional wall motion with low-dose dobutamine [38] |
PET | ||
F-18 FDG | Glucose uptake | >50% peak activity |
LGE late gadolinium enhancement
The techniques of strain and strain rate imaging, 3D echocardiography, BMIPP SPECT, C-11 acetate and palmitate PET, and delayed contrast enhancement using MDCT are currently under investigation and criteria for viability are not well established