Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Mar 14.
Published in final edited form as: Psychiatr Serv. 2012 Aug;63(8):765–771. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201100430

Table 1.

Selected fidelity measures for community-based interventions for persons with serious mental illnesses.

Measure1 Program Fidelity measurement
Intervention Complexity2 Domains Focus Methods
CTPAS Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for Psychosis Low Single intervention, single practitioner Practitioner adherence in dyadic interactions Direct observation via audiotape
SM-FS Strengths Model of case management Moderate Single practice philosophy; multiple practitioners & program components Group adherence to intervention philosophy; program structure and quality maintenance mechanisms Records review; on-site interview & observation
IMR-FS Illness Management and Recovery Moderate Multiple interventions, practitioners, & program components Group adherence to criteria for practice delivery within multi-component program; program structure
TMACT Assertive Community Treatment High Multiple integrated interventions, disciplines, & practitioners; complex multi-component program model Program & practitioner-level adherence to criteria for program structure and multiple team & discipline-specific practices
1

CTPAS = Cognitive Therapy for Psychosis Adherence Scale; SM-FS = Strengths Model Fidelity Scale; IMR-FS = Illness Management and Recovery Program Fidelity Scale; TMACT = Tool for Measurement of Assertive Community Treatment

2

Program complexity: relative scope of specified program levels and elements