Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Mar 14.
Published in final edited form as: Neurosurg Focus. 2013 Apr;34(4):E6. doi: 10.3171/2013.2.FOCUS12413

TABLE 5.

Patient and tumor parameters versus LI*

Statistic

Parameter Broca LI Wernicke LI
patient sex F(1,47) = 4.84; p = 0.49 F(1,47) = 0.03; p = 0.87
patient age H = 1.48, 1 df, p = 0.22 H = 1.67, 1 df, p = 0.20
tumor grade F(1,47) = 0.20; p = 0.66 F(1,47) = 0.10; p = 0.75
tumor vol H = 2.18, 1 df, p = 0.14 H = 8.26, 1 df, p = 0.004
Broca LAD (from center of activation) H = 7.44, 2 df, p = 0.02 H = 2.64, 2 df, p = 0.26
Wernicke LAD (from center of activation) H = 1.52, 2 df, p = 0.47 H = 7.53, 2 df, p = 0.02
*

Comparisons between LI and sex or tumor grade were done using 1-way ANOVA. Comparisons between LI and age, tumor volume, and LAD were done by grouping the independent variables. Median split was performed on age and tumor volume. The LAD was grouped into 3 categories: LAD < 1 cm, 1–2 cm, and > 2 cm. Chi-square tests of association, Kruskal-Wallis test, and 1-way ANOVA were used.

Significant (p ≤ 0.05).