Skip to main content
. 2014 Mar 14;9(3):e91020. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0091020

Table 3. A Comparison of Bleomycin/Vincristine versus Vincristine Monotherapy on the Probability of Tumor Improvement at 40–42 Weeks*.

Risk Ratio 95% Confidence Interval
A. Comparison of Tumor Improvement versus non-improvement (stable, progressive) (N = 346)
Unadjusted 2.25 (1.47, 3.44)
Adjusted 2.46 (1.57, 3.86)
B. Comparison of tumor improvement versus non-improvement (stable, progressive, dead, default) (N = 354)
Unadjusted 1.88 (1.16, 3.03)
Adjusted 2.06 (1.24, 3.41)
C. Comparison of tumor improvement versus non-improvement (stable, progressive, dead, default, missing) (N = 449)
Unadjusted 1.42 (0.81, 2.51)
Adjusted 1.48 (0.85, 2.60)

*Comparison of the probability of tumor improvement versus tumor non-improvement among patients on Bleomycin/Vincristine versus those on Vincristine monotherapy. In model (A), only patients with recorded tumor information are included. In model (B), all patients who were dead or lost/defaulted were also included and categorized with tumor non-improvement. In model C, all patients who were dead, lost/defaulted, or missing were classified as having tumor non-improvement. All adjusted models control for age and baseline CD4 count.