. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Mar 15.

Published in final edited form as: Psychol Addict Behav. 2011 May 23;26(1):112–123. doi: 10.1037/a0023460

Table 3.

Study One: Results of Planned Contrasts Among Control, ED, SUD, and Comorbid Groups on Eating Expectancies and Thinness Expectancies

	Control (n = 14)	ED (n = 40)	SUD (n = 31)	Comorbid (n = 19)	F
EEI 1	2.41 (1.25)	4.05^a (1.06)	3.34 (1.36)	4.26^a (1.35)	7.59^**
EEI 2	5.39^a (.92)	4.36 (1.32)	4.26 (.80)	4.77 (1.17)	4.01^*
EEI 3	2.27 (1.32)	5.46^a (1.12)	3.44 (1.11)	4.99^a (1.50)	32.20^**
EEI 4	3.45 (1.38)	3.73 (1.61)	3.78 (1.90)	4.08 (1.87)	.35
EEI 5	4.09 (1.51)	4.76 (1.52)	3.98 (1.23)	4.77 (1.58)	2.85
TREI	3.53 (1.44)	5.20^a (1.18)	3.97 (1.75)	4.71^a (1.56)	11.79^**

Note. Group scores are followed by standard deviations in parentheses. Numbers with different subscripts differ at p < .01; numbers with the same subscripts do not differ significantly from each other. ED = Eating Disorder group; SUD = Substance Use Disorder Group; EEI1 = Eating alleviates negative affect; EEI 2 = Eating is pleasurable and useful as a reward; EEI 3 = Eating alleviates boredom; EEI 4 = Eating enhances cognitive competence; EEI 5 = Eating leads to feeling out of control; TREI = Thinness and restricting inventory/Thinness leads to overgeneralized life improvement.

indicates p < .05.

^**

p < .01.