Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Subst Use Misuse. 2014 Apr;49(5):571–585. doi: 10.3109/10826084.2013.770025

Table 4.

Analysis of Change in Self-Report Measures over Time

Measures MTS Group (n = 38) Control Group (n = 43) ANCOVA Model Effects
Baseline
mean(sd)
4-week
mean(sd)
24-weeks
mean(sd)
Baseline
mean(sd)
4-weeks
mean(sd)
24-weeks
mean(sd)
Group
F statistic, sig
Time
F statistic, sig
Time × Group
F statistic, sig
Difficulty with Emotion
Regulation Scale
2.18 (.57) 1.96 (.51) 1.90 (.63) 1.95 (.50) 2.00 (.53) 1.98 (.56) F(1,78) = .41, p = .52 F(2,78) = 4.89, p = .01 F(2,78) = 5.65, p < .001*
Attentional Control Scale 2.52 (.37) 2.76 (.42) 2.76(.41) 2.77 (.36) 2.78 (.39) 2.73 (.39) F(1,78) = .69, p = .41 F(2,78) = 7.29, p < .001* F(2,78) = .8.43, p < .001*
Five Facet Mindfulness
Questionnaire FFMQ
3.30 (.50) 3.65 (.54) 3.62 (.58) 3.52 (.46) 3.56 (.56) 3.49 (.45) F(1,78) = .15, p = .70 F(2,78) = 7.34, p < .001* F(2,78) = 10.22, p < .001*
FFMQ subscale:
Non-judging
3.20 (.91) 3.87 (.79) 3.62 (.90) 3.74 (.75) 3.82 (.75) 3.54 (.73) F(1,78) = .33, p = .57 F(2,78) = 2.55, p = .08 F(2,78) = 7.19, p < .001*
FFMQ subscale:
Observing
3.51 (.75) 3.68 (.65) 3.72 (.65) 3.33 (.74) 3.15 (.72) 3.38 (.72) F(1,78) = 5.51, p = .02 F(2,78) = 2.83, p = .06 F(2,78) = 3.52, p = .03
FFMQ subscale:
Non- reactivity
3.15 (.61) 3.51 (.56) 3.51 (.63) 3.31 (.58) 3.35 (.77) 3.42 (.63) F(1,78) = .09, p = .77 F(2,78) = 7.96, p < .001* F(2,78) = 3.59, p = .03
FFMQ subscale:
Describing
3.54 (.81) 3.69 (.87) 3.76 (.82) 3.75 (.90) 3.77 (.72) 3.64 (.70) F(1,78) = .47, p = .49 F(2,78) = 2.45, p = .09 F(2,78) = 4.57, p = .01
FFMQ subscale:
Acting with Awareness
3.08 (.79) 3.40 (.70) 3.38 (.68) 3.54 (.66) 3.63 (.66) 3.47 (.66) F(1,78) = 4.58, p = .04 F(2,78) = 3.50, p = .03 F(2,78) = 5.49, p = .01
1

Mixed ANCOVAs were computed controlling for abstinence status. The analysis includes participants with data from all three assessment visits.

*

Values with asterisk are statistically significant after Bonferroni correction. Values without asterisk are not significant after Bonferroni correction.