Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Mar 15.
Published in final edited form as: J Immunol Methods. 2012 Oct 22;387(0):89–95. doi: 10.1016/j.jim.2012.09.015

Table 1. Descriptive Statistics for the 151 samples run on 3 separate occasions by each laboratory.

Allergen Statistic Run Lab
A
Lab
B
Lab
C
Lab
D
Lab
E
Lab
F
Lab
G
Lab
H
Lab
I
Bla g 2
(ng/ml)
Mean* 1 7.3 11.5 10.1 15.4 12.4 10.0 21.8 10.9 9.9
2 7.2 13.8 11.1 14.0 13.4 11.5 17.2 11.4 9.2
3 7.6 13.3 11.1 13.4 13.2 10.9 15.8 11.4 10.3
CV% 6.5% 7.8% 7.8% 5.1% 4.3% 4.7% 9.1% 4.1% 7.8%

Can f 1
(ng/ml)
Mean 1 11.3 12.6 11.7 13.1 11.5 9.5 17.7 9.0 14.9
2 12.2 13.4 13.0 13.0 13.7 11.1 18.1 11.1 15.8
3 10.3 11.0 13.2 13.8 12.4 11.0 14.4 11.1 16.7
CV% 4.9% 3.8% 4.4% 6.6% 6.8% 5.5% 14.4% 7.1% 7.1%

Der f 1
(ng/ml)
Mean 1 4.7 5.4 4.9 5.3 4.4 4.1 7.2 5.0 4.9
2 4.8 6.1 5.2 5.5 4.6 4.8 6.6 5.3 4.8
3 4.4 5.9 5.3 5.6 4.6 4.7 6.1 5.2 5.5
CV% 3.9% 5.3% 5.5% 8.8% 7.2% 6.2% 12.5% 11.6% 9.3%

Der p 1
(ng/ml)
Mean 1 5.4 6.1 5.8 6.6 5.3 4.6 8.8 5.6 5.9
2 5.4 6.4 6.2 7.2 5.9 5.4 7.8 5.0 6.5
3 5.1 6.3 6.5 7.2 5.8 3.5 7.0 5.4 6.5
CV% 4.6% 5.4% 5.7% 9.4% 5.5% 12.1% 11.1% 11.6% 7.3%

Fel d 1
(ng/ml)
Mean 1 11.4 12.5 11.2 13.6 12.5 8.2 14.1 9.3 12.1
2 11.2 14.6 12.4 13.8 14.4 10.0 14.3 10.4 17.9
3 9.9 11.2 12.5 13.8 13.6 10.0 11.7 11.3 21.8
CV% 5.8% 9.4% 6.7% 12.3% 8.5% 6.0% 13.7% 9.9% 17.3%

Mite Gr 2
(ng/ml)
Mean 1 7.2 8.6 8.7 6.8 7.6 5.0 11.9 8.6 9.4
2 7.2 9.1 9.6 7.2 8.6 5.8 10.9 7.2 10.6
3 6.8 9.5 10.2 7.0 8.7 5.5 9.1 6.6 10.6
CV% 4.6% 10.4% 6.3% 8.6% 7.8% 7.8% 11.3% 14.0% 9.2%

Mus m 1
(ng/ml)
Mean 1 0.9 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.8 1.4 0.8 1.0
2 1.0 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 0.9 1.3 0.9 1.1
3 1.0 1.0 1.1 1.1 1.0 0.8 1.1 1.0 1.1
CV% 3.5% 4.1% 6.0% 6.4% 5.4% 4.1% 11.2% 7.2% 5.8%

Rat n 1
(ng/ml)
Mean 1 0.9 1.7 1.2 1.6 1.0 1.0 1.6 1.0 1.2
2 0.9 1.5 1.3 1.5 1.2 0.9 1.5 0.9 1.1
3 0.9 1.6 1.4 1.5 1.1 0.9 1.1 1.0 1.1
CV% 0.3% 7.1% 7.9% 3.2% 5.0% 3.2% 21.6% 4.4% 10.1%
*

Geometric Mean

The coefficient of variation was calculated as the mean of the standard deviation to the mean of the 151 samples.

The coefficient of variation for Rat n 1 should be interpreted with caution given the low number of specimens above the level of detection.