Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Mar 15.
Published in final edited form as: AIDS Rev. 2013 Jul-Sep;15(3):162–170.

Table 2.

Prevalence of HIV Drug Resistance in South East Asia Region By Drug Class*

Study Prevalence of Nucleoside
Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitor
HIVDR
Prevalence of Non Nucleoside
Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitor
HIVDR
Prevalence of Protease
Inhibitor HIVDR
Studies of Transmitted HIVDR
Apisarnthanarak et al 2008 (All years)74 6/305 (2%) 7/305 (2%) None
Ayouba et al 200933 None None None
Chonwattana et al 200736 2/165 (1%) 1/165 (1%) None
Iqbal et al 201030 None 2/18 (11%) None
Leelawiwat et al 201135 2/91 (2%) 2/91 (2%) None
Sirivichayakul et al 200637 None None None
Sirivichayakul et al 200834
– Population 1:
– Population 2:

None
None

None
None

None
None
Soundararajan et al 200771 None None None
Thorat et al 201132 None 1/47 (2%) None
Truong et al 2009,31 - - -
Studies of Acquired HIVDR
Bhrushundi et al 201149 27/30 (90%) 28/30 (93%) 6/30 (20%)§
Chasombat et al 2010,,25 - - -
Deshpande et al 2007,44 - - -
Deshpande et al 2010,26 26/27 (96%) 27/27 (100%) None
Dettrairat et al 2006,72 - - -
Ekstrand et al 201152 63/92 (68%) 66/92 (72%) None
Gupta et al 201050 47/51 (92%) 32/51 (62%) 4/51 (8%)
Karnkawinpong et al 2006,75 - - -
Kumarasamy et al 200945 124/138 (90%) 90/138 (65%) None
Puthanakit et al 2011,76 - - -
Sen et al 2007,,27 - - -
Sen et al 2007,28 24/50 (67%) 26/50 (72%) None
Solomon et al 2007,77 - - -
Sukasem et al 2007,,29 - - -
Sungkanuparph et al 2007,46 - - -
Sungkanuparph et al 200851 11/21 (52%) 9/21 (43%) None
Vidya et al 2009,78 - - -
Studies of HIVDR in Pre-treatment Populations
Apisarnthanarak et al 2008,61 - - None
Arora et al 2008,79 - - -
Auwanit et al 200959 None None None
Balakrishnan et al 200568 1/50 (2%) 1/50 (2%) 1/50 (2%)
Chasombat et al 2010,25 None 5/304 (2%) None
Chaturbhuj et al 201041 None None None
Deshpande 2010,26 2% None None
Deshpande et al 200469 2/128 (2%) None 1/128 (1%)
Iqbal et al 200962 1/55 (2%) None None
Kandathil et al 200967 1/93 (1%) 1/93 (1%) None
Lall et al 200863 3/40 (8%) None 1/40 (3%)
Neogi et al 201038 None None None
Nuntachit et al 2011,64 - - -
Potdar et al 2011,65 - - -
Rajesh et al 200970 2/104 (2%) 2/104 (2%) 1/99 (1%)
Saini et al 201080 1/70 (1%) None None
Sen et al 2007,27 None None None
Sen et al 2007,28 None None None
Shet et al 201166 None 1/50 (2%) None
Sinha et al 201060 4/53 (8%) None 1/53 (2%)
Sirivichayakul et al 201139 2008: 0.8%
2009: 2.6%
2010: 5.1%
2008: 0.8%
2009: 1.3%
2010: 3.4%
2008: 4.3%
2009: 1.3%
2010: 3.4%
Sukasem et al 2007,,29 - None None
Tovanabutra et al 200440 None None None
*

The prevalence of HIV drug resistance in this table was calculated by dividing the total number of specimens with a ≥ 1 drug resistance mutation conferring resistance in the appropriate drug class divided by the total number of specimens from patients in the cohort with virological failure

Class HIVDR defined using the WHO Surveillance Drug Resistance Mutations 2009 list

Data presented in journal article or abstract did not have sufficient detail which might include specific DRMs detected or individual sample-level information to allow calculation of prevalence of drug class HIVDR

§

PI resistance described as ‘major or minor mutations’ without description of specific DRMs which did not allow exclusion of minor PI mutations from the calculation of the mean prevalence estimate

This study described two cohorts: one cohort on ART and one cohort about to start ART. Therefore, results from each of the cohorts described in this study are reported separately in studies of acquired HIVDR and studies of HIVDR in pre-treatment populations.