Skip to main content
. 2014 Feb 26;2014:768406. doi: 10.1155/2014/768406

Table 1.

Comparison of GOS content measured in different products using the AOAC method and the new method and comparison of results using both classical and robust statistics.

Sample Reference value  Results (g/100 g)  Results (g/100 g) 
(g/100 g) Robust Classical
Mean SD Median SD Recovery (%) P Mean SD Recovery (%) P
GOS-1A 37.32 0.56 43.51 1.15 117* 0.001 43.54 1.57 117* 0.001
GOS-1B 36.26 1.32 43.75 1.81 121* 0.006 43.52 1.01 120* 0.007
GOS-2 39.53 0.40 39.42 1.17 99.7 0.861 39.66 1.08 100 0.839
GOS-3A 38.46 0.20 42.38 1.03 110* 0.000 42.27 0.666 110* 0.000
GOS-3B 51.45 0.34 54.11 1.04 105* 0.005 54.13 0.799 105* 0.003
GOS-4 28.70 1.06 26.00 0.274 90.6* 0.038 26.03 0.205 90.7* 0.040
GOS-5 79.02 1.11 66.06 0.382 83.6* 0.000 66.56 1.69 84.2* 0.000
GOS-6 44.66 0.76 43.12 0.555 96.6 0.101 43.06 0.447 96.4 0.088

*Indicates recoveries which are significantly different from 100% (P < 0.05).