Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Jan 30.
Published in final edited form as: Psychiatry Res. 2013 Nov 5;215(1):87–94. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2013.10.037

Table 2.

Results from Exploratory Regression Analyses Predicting Within-Pair Differences in Neuropsychological Performance Between MD Probands and their Unaffected Cotwins

Digit Symbol Substitution Letter-Number Sequencing Block Design Verbal Paired Associates – Immediate Verbal Paired Associates – Delayed Vocabulary
 N Pairs 25 38 26 40 38 40
 Pair Difference M 1.44 0.05 −0.04 −0.08 −0.13 2.48
 (SD) 9.98 1.80 7.49 8.21 3.16 7.19

Parameter Estimates (SE)
Intercept 2.8 (16.2) 3.5 (2.1) −7.7 (11.6) −0.7 (9.0) 1.5 (3.8) 5.0 (8.7)
Age −0.06 (0.3) −0.07 (0.04) −0.02 (0.2) −0.06 (0.2) −0.02 (0.07) 0.01 (0.2)
Sex −0.3 (4.5) −0.7 (0.7) −2.4 (3.2) −4.5 (2.8) −0.7 (1.1) 4.9 (2.7)
Mode-Diff a -- −0.01 (0.6) -- 3.7 (2.4) 0.9 (1.1) −1.8 (2.3)
Early Onset −10.7 (5.9) −0.5 (0.8) −4.2 (4.0) −1.8 (3.3) −0.1 (1.4) 4.6 (3.2)
WorstSev 0.2 (1.4) 0.1 (0.2) 1.7 (1.0) 0.9 (0.7) −0.1 (0.3) −1.0 (0.6)
Mother MD 5.3 (5.3) −1.5 (0.7) −4.3 (3.6) −4.2 (2.8) −1.1 (1.2) −1.6 (2.7)
Father MD 2.2 (7.7) −0.5 (0.8) 0.4 (5.2) 8.8 (3.5) 3.5 (1.4) 1.0 (3.3)
Model R2 (%) 20.8 26.2 26.2 32.8 28.1 19.2

Sex coded as Male=1. Mode= 1 if telephone assessment; Worst severity = # symptoms during worst episode. Early Onset=first episode before 18. Negative coefficients are in direction of worse performance by the Proband.

a

not applicable for BD and DSS; all twins with data were tested in person