Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Exp Aging Res. 2014;40(2):140–163. doi: 10.1080/0361073X.2014.882204

Table 2.

Associations Between Odds of Skipping Spaces on AVLT Forms and Demographic Characteristics: Results from ACTIVE (N=1,401)

Odds ratio 95% CI
Effect Sizes of Training on skipping spaces on the AVLT
 Baseline to Immediate post-training 16.0 (4.6, 55.2)
 Baseline to Year 1 7.1 (2.0, 25.7)
 Baseline to Year 2 4.1 (1.0, 16.6)
 Baseline to Year 3 5.8 (1.6, 21.0)
 Baseline to Year 5 3.3 (0.8, 12.9)
Predictors of skipping spaces on the AVLT
 AVLT serial clustering 2.0 (1.7, 2.3)
 Age 0.6 (0.4, 0.9)
 Sex (Female) 0.5 (0.3, 0.8)
 Ethnicity (White) 1.7 (0.9, 3.0)
 Self-rated Health Status 1.2 (0.8, 1.9)
 Education 1.1 (1.0, 1.2)

Legend. Results from random effects logistic regression models of AVLT skipping regressed on time, training status, interactions between time and training status, AVLT serial clustering, age, sex, ethnicity, self-rated health status, and education. Interactions between treatment and time are interpreted as standardized effect sizes for the difference in odds of AVLT skipping between memory-trained and control groups.

95% CI: 95% Confidence interval.