Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Pain. 2013 Dec;14(12 0):T63–74.e1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2013.06.007

Table 2.

Univariate associations of thermal pain measures and incidence rates of first-onset TMD

Distribution of risk factor at enrolment Site-adjusted(1) TMD incidence rate (% of people per annum) according to tercile of risk factor Standardized hazard ratios (95%CI) adjusted for: Imputed estimates with adjustment for study site + demographics (5)
Stimulus Units and potential range n mean (sd) [1st, 2nd tercile] Lower Mid Upper Study site (2) Study site + demographics(3) P-value(4) n Hazard ratio (95%CI) P-value(4)
Heat pain threshold(6) °C, 32–52 2103 42.2 (3.1) [41.0; 44.0] 3.9 4.4 3.7 1.00 (0.86, 1.15) 1.00 (0.86, 1.16) 0.97 2103 1.03 (0.88, 1.20) 0.720
Heat pain tolerance(6) °C, 32–52 2455 46.2 (2.4) [45.4; 47.2] 4.2 4.3 3.7 1.05 (0.92, 1.18) 1.03 (0.91, 1.16) 0.620 2567 1.06 (0.92, 1.21) 0.410
Single stimulus ratings
 46°C rating, 0–100 2429 36.7 (32.0) [10.0; 50.0] 3.1 3.9 5.0 1.12 (0.99, 1.27) 1.11 (0.98, 1.25) 0.094 2539 1.11 (0.97, 1.27) 0.120
 48°C rating, 0–100 2400 45.1 (32.9) [20.0; 60.0] 3.9 4.0 4.5 1.05 (0.92, 1.19) 1.04 (0.91, 1.17) 0.590 2539 1.14 (0.99, 1.30) 0.062
 50°C rating, 0–100 2322 57.4 (33.9) [35.0; 80.0] 4.2 3.8 4.2 1.05 (0.92, 1.19) 1.04 (0.91, 1.18) 0.550 2539 1.07 (0.93, 1.23) 0.320
Ratings of 10 stimuli: area under curve
 46°C ratings, 0–1000 2030 347.8 (236.4) [185.0; 467.5] 3.5 4.1 3.5 1.00 (0.86, 1.16) 1.05 (0.90, 1.21) 0.530 2539 1.16 (1.01, 1.32) 0.033
 48°C ratings, 0–1000 1701 412.2 (242.2) [255.0; 557.5] 2.6 3.1 3.6 1.10 (0.92, 1.29) 1.14 (0.96, 1.34) 0.130 2539 1.22 (1.06, 1.41) 0.006
 50°C ratings, 0–1000 1258 466.9 (248.7) [330.0; 630.0] 2.2 2.9 3.1 1.16 (0.94, 1.40) 1.20 (0.98, 1.46) 0.076 2539 1.23 (1.05, 1.41) 0.006
Maximum rating from among 10 stimuli
 46°C ratings, 0–1000 2534 57.1 (33.7) [35.0; 80.0] 3.8 3.9 4.6 1.11 (0.97, 1.26) 1.12 (0.97, 1.28) 0.099 2539 1.16 (1.01, 1.32) 0.032
 48°C ratings, 0–1000 2509 68.2 (32.2) [53.0; 95.0] 3.3 4.1 5.2 1.22 (1.06, 1.39) 1.23 (1.06, 1.41) 0.004 2539 1.23 (1.06, 1.42) 0.005
 50°C ratings, 0–1000 2420 77.6 (29.5) [75.0; 100.0] . . . 1.21 (1.05, 1.39) 1.21 (1.04, 1.40) 0.009 2539 1.24 (1.06, 1.44) 0.005
Thermal aftersensations
 15 s, 46°C rating, 0–100 2498 0.5 (0.4) [0.0; 1.0] . . . 1.08 (0.94, 1.22) 1.09 (0.95, 1.24) 0.190 2504 1.07 (0.93, 1.22) 0.320
 30 s, 46°C rating, 0–100 2500 0.4 (0.4) [0.0; 1.0] . . . 1.14 (1.00, 1.28) 1.15 (1.00, 1.30) 0.036 2504 1.12 (0.98, 1.27) 0.095
 15 s, 48°C rating, 0–100 2501 0.6 (0.4) [0.0; 1.0] . . . 1.17 (1.01, 1.33) 1.20 (1.04, 1.37) 0.011 2504 1.17 (1.01, 1.34) 0.026
 30 s, 48°C rating, 0–100 2502 0.5 (0.4) [0.0; 1.0] . . . 1.12 (0.97, 1.27) 1.12 (0.98, 1.28) 0.088 2504 1.11 (0.96, 1.26) 0.140
 15 s, 50°C rating, 0–100 2405 0.7 (0.4) [0.0; 1.0] . . . 1.13 (0.98, 1.29) 1.14 (0.99, 1.31) 0.067 2504 1.13 (0.98, 1.30) 0.081
 30 s, 50°C rating, 0–100 2401 0.5 (0.4) [0.0; 1.0] . . . 1.16 (1.01, 1.33) 1.17 (1.02, 1.34) 0.023 2504 1.14 (0.99, 1.30) 0.063
Temporal summation: highest minus first rating
 46°C Δ ratings, 0–100 2302 20.2 (26.2) [10.0; 30.0] 3.69 4.15 4.07 0.99 (0.86, 1.12) 1.00 (0.87, 1.14) 0.980 2539 1.07 (0.94, 1.20) 0.310
 48°C Δ ratings, 0–100 2207 25.2 (25.8) [10.0; 30.0] 3.1 3.83 4.11 1.12 (0.98, 1.28) 1.11 (0.96, 1.26) 0.130 2539 1.07 (0.94, 1.20) 0.300
 50°C Δ ratings, 0–100 1922 25.5 (25.4) [10.0; 30.0] 2.8 2.9 4.2 1.24 (1.07, 1.43) 1.25 (1.07, 1.44) 0.003 2539 1.14 (1.00, 1.28) 0.039
Temporal summation: slope of line for first three ratings
 46°C β coefficient 2304 6.7 (10.2) [2.5; 7.5] 4.41 3.44 4.25 0.99 (0.86, 1.13) 0.99 (0.86, 1.13) 0.860 2539 1.04 (0.91, 1.17) 0.570
 48°C β coefficient 2211 8.1 (10.9) [2.5; 10.0] 3.19 3.43 4.59 1.12 (0.99, 1.26) 1.09 (0.97, 1.22) 0.140 2539 1.08 (0.96, 1.20) 0.180
 50°C β coefficient 1922 9.0 (12.1) [2.5; 10.0] 3.14 3.41 3.58 1.15 (1.01, 1.31) 1.14 (1.00, 1.29) 0.050 2539 1.12 (1.00, 1.26) 0.044
(1)

Adjusted rates computed using Poisson regression controlling for study site (categorical variable, 4 levels). Estimated rate is for reference study site (UB). Empty cells in these columns reflect variables for which a tercile is equal to either a floor (“0”) or ceiling (“100”) value, thus precluding calculation of incidence rate by tercile.

(2)

Hazard ratios represent relative increase in rate of TMD associated with an increase of 1 s.d. in risk factor. Computed using Cox proportional hazard regression model controlling for study site (categorical variable, 4 levels).

(3)

As for footnote 2, with additional adjustment for age (in years as a continuous variable), gender (categorical, 2 levels), race/ethnicity (categorical, 5 levels) and lifetime US residence (categorical, 2 levels).

(4)

P-value evaluating null hypothesis that the hazard ratio equals one.

(5)

As for footnote 3, with inclusion of imputed TMD rates for subjects lost to follow-up or with questionable examiner-classification

(6)

Negative z-score were used for standardized hazard ratios which therefore represent increase in incidence associated with reduction of 1 SD in threshold