Skip to main content
letter
. 2014 Jan 21;5(2):326–330. doi: 10.4161/viru.27724

graphic file with name viru-5-326-g1.jpg

Figure 1. Enzymatic profile of S. maltophilia isolates. (A) SM ATCC, (B) clinical isolate of S. maltophilia; (C) S. maltophilia LMG 959 (environmental isolate). When (A–C) were compared, for all tested properties, (C) (environmental strain) showed comparatively less activity.