Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Dec 3.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Psychiatr Rehabil. 2013 Dec 3;16(4):262–274. doi: 10.1080/15487768.2013.847745

Table 1.

Staff Values and Approaches

Measure PHF (n = 37) M (SD) TF (n = 31) M (SD) Citywide (n = 61) M (SD) Test F or t Range
Consumer values 4.3 (0.6) 3.1 (0.8) 3.6 (0.7) 24.49** 1–5
System values 2.8 (0.8) 3.8 (0.7) 3.7 (0.6) 24.92** 1–5
MEAPS 2.8 (0.4) 3.2 (0.5) NA 3.91** 1–4
Vignettes 0.1 (0.2) 0.3 (0.3) NA 3.26* 0–1

Note. Higher scores indicate higher presence of given construct; for MEAPS, higher scores indicate policies that exclude deviant clients; for vignettes, higher scores indicate the client would have to leave housing. PHF staff differed from TF and citywide staff separately at p < .001 for both values measures with Bonferroni correction. MEAPS = Multiphasic Environmental Assessment Procedure; NA = not available; PHF = Pathways’ Housing First, TF = treatment first.

*

p < .01

**

p < .001