Skip to main content
. 2014 Mar 17;9(3):e92201. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0092201

Table 3. Multivariate models.

Predictor η2 F Effect df Error df p
Model 1: All growth and anthropometric variables; sucrose and salt preference as joint outcome measures
Sex 0.07 2.52 2 68 0.088
 Height (m) 0.14 5.57 2 68 0.006
 NTx/creatinine 0.12 4.74 2 68 0.012
 Percent body fat 0.12 4.42 2 68 0.016
Age (years) 0.05 1.73 2 68 0.186
Model 2: Same as Model 1 but with no NTx outliers
 Sex 0.09 3.40 2 64 0.040
 Height (m) 0.15 5.74 2 64 0.005
NTx/creatinine 0.01 0.19 2 64 0.826
Percent body fat 0.11 3.91 2 64 0.024
Age (years) 0.06 2.03 2 64 0.140
Model 3: Same as Model 2 but with sucrose preference as only outcome measure
 Sex 0.07 5.33 1 65 0.024
 Height (m) 0.15 11.43 1 65 0.001
NTx/creatinine 0.00 0.29 1 65 0.588
Percent body fat 0.02 1.29 1 65 0.260
Age (years) 0.05 3.45 1 65 0.068
Model 4: Same as Model 2 but with salt preference as only outcome measure
Sex 0.03 2.30 1 65 0.13
Height (m) 0.01 0.78 1 65 0.38
NTx/creatinine 0.00 0.14 1 65 0.71
Percent body fat 0.08 5.89 1 65 0.02
Age (years) 0.02 1.08 1 65 0.30

η2, proportion of variance accounted for; F, Fisher value; df, degrees of freedom. Only children with complete data for these variables were included in the analysis (e.g., n = 78 for Model 1). Variables shown in boldface made a significant contribution to the model.