Skip to main content
. 2014 Jan 14;18(4):466–474. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivt552

Table 2:

Histological evaluation (villi height, villi width, mucosal thickness and crypt depth) of haematoxylin- and eosin-stained sections of intestinal mucosa at 15 and 60 min of ischaemia (I15′, I60′), and 1 and 7 days of reperfusion (R1d, R7d)

Group Villi height (µm) Villi width (µm) Mucosal thickness (µm) Crypt depth (µm)
I15′/R1d, saline 273.6 ± 73.0*,*** 116.9 ± 14.2*,*** 576.0 ± 39.4*** 201.5 ± 39.1*,***
I15′/R1d, PGE1 311.1 ± 23.4*,**,*** 121.5 ± 18.2*,**,*** 611.2 ± 65.3*** 219.3 ± 48.3*,**,***
I60′/R1d, saline 233.0 ± 49.7* 91.4 ± 22.3* 517.5 ± 82.4* 166.2 ± 39.9*
I60′/R1d, PGE1 256.4 ± 34.3** 96.2 ± 11.7*,** 511.3 ± 71.1* 164.3 ± 17.9*
I15′/R7d, saline 338.4 ± 41.0* 133.2 ± 36.6*** 685.7 ± 70.0*,*** 223.4 ± 59.0*,***
I15′/R7d, PGE1 343.1 ± 73.2*,**,*** 131.2 ± 27.3*** 683.1 ± 75.8*** 253.4 ± 42.2*,***
I60′/R7d, saline 296.7 ± 33.5* 101.2 ± 23.7* 522.3 ± 69.0* 176.6 ± 23.7
I60′/R7d, PGE1 322.0 ± 57.3 111.0 ± 13.3** 523.9 ± 53.9* 199.6 ± 22.6
Sham/1d 306.8 ± 57.3 137.5 ± 11.2 696.1 ± 43.7 231.5 ± 57.1
Sham/7d 351.6 ± 59.4 128.2 ± 13.3 671.2 ± 32.6 248.4 ± 39.2

IV administration of saline and PGE1. All data are expressed as mean ± SD.

*P < 0.05 compared sham-operated group.

**P < 0.05 compared saline vs PGE1.

***P < 0.05 compared 15′ vs 60′.