TABLE 2.

Characteristics of MOP-utilizing wild-type isolates

Straina	Opine(s) utilizedb	Conjugation frequencyc		Isolation		Tumorigenic	Agrocin sensitivity	Biovar
		Uninduced	Induced with MOP	Host	Location
AF1/95	MOP, OCT	<10−8	<10−8	Lilac	Visalia, CA	Yes	No	2
AR11N/71	MOP, NOP, OCT	<10−8	<10−8	Apple	Canby, OR	Yes	NDd	ND
B24/93	MOP	3.3 × 10−6	9.0 × 10−7	Quince	Portland, OR	No	No	2
B26/94	MOP, NOP	<10−8	<10−8	Walnut	Portland, OR	Yes	No	2
B98/94	MOP	1.5 × 10−5	2.6 × 10−6	Walnut	Gridley, CA	Yes	No	2
B155/93	MOP, NOP	<10−8	<10−8	Quince	Portland, OR	No	Yes	ND
F64/95	MOP	<10−8	6.6 × 10−5	Apple	Modesto, CA	No	Yes	2
F265/93	MOP	<10−8	4.4 × 10−5	Apple	Yamhill, OR	No	Yes	2
J62/95	MOP, NOP	<10−8	4.6 × 10−5	Apple	Modesto, CA	Yes	Yes	2
J84/95	MOP, NOP	<10−8	3.1 × 10−5	Apple	Modesto, CA	Yes	Yes	2
M200/94	MOP	<10−8	3.6 × 10−5	Apple	Woodburn, OR	No	ND	2

^aThe wild-type isolates listed all utilize mannopine and were obtained from Larry Moore, Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR.

^bNOP, nopaline; OCT, octopine.

^cConjugation frequency was measured as the number of transconjugates recovered per input donor cell.

^dND, not determined.