Skip to main content
. 2014 Mar;52(3):814–822. doi: 10.1128/JCM.02488-13

FIG 3.

FIG 3

(A) Comparison of μ-capture IgM SFV-prME test and μ-capture IgM bac-prME assay adjusted absorbance values for 140 blood serum samples that were analyzed with the same IgM bac-prME test and thus are comparable to each other. The correlation coefficient between the tests was 0.94. The cutoff value of μ-capture IgM SFV-prME test was adjusted to 0.36, and to 0.35 for the IgM bac-prME test. (B) Comparison of μ-capture IgM SFV-prME test and commercial IgM test adjusted absorbance values for 140 serum samples that were analyzed with the same commercial test. The correlation coefficient between the tests was 0.89. The cutoff value of μ-capture IgM SFV-prME test was adjusted to 0.36, and for commercial test in this lot, it was 0.35. (C) Comparison of IgG MAb-capture SFV-prME test and commercial IgG ELISA adjusted absorbance values for 140 serum samples analyzed with the same commercial test. The correlation coefficient between the tests was 0.79. The cutoff value of IgG MAb-capture SFV-prME test was adjusted to 0.26, and for commercial test in this lot, it was 0.35.