Skip to main content
. 2014 Mar 18;9(3):e90793. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0090793

Table 3. In vivo antitumor activity of DBDFT against mice S180 and H22 (Inline graphic±SD).

Cells Dosage (mg kg−1) Mice weight (g) Average tumor weight (g) Inhibition (%) p
Initial/Final (10 days)
S180 0.0 23.29±1.28/27.62±3.66 2.39±0.64
2.5 23.19±0.91/27.65±1.51 1.88±0.16 21.04* <0.05
5.0 23.29±1.15/26.66±2.02 1.59±0.44 33.36** <0.01
10.0 23.33±1.47/25.27±2.02 0.87±0.27 63.62** <0.01
2.5 (Positive DDP) 23.36±1.14/21.19±1.93 0.52±0.24 78.24** <0.01
H22 0.0 23.03±0.82/28.04±2.93 2.12±0.50
2.5 23.20±0.73/27.70±3.95 2.02±0.34 4.53
5.0 23.42±0.67/26.98±4.00 1.57±0.35 25.19* <0.05
10.0 23.12±0.72/25.04±2.67 1.02±0.16 52.05** <0.01
2.5 (Positive DDP) 23.23±1.59/20.16±1.41 0.58±0.39 79.15** <0.01

Note: Mice number for the starting and final test was 10. The dosage of each sample were 0.0 mg kg−1 (normal group), 2.5 mg kg−1 (Low dosage group), 5 mg kg−1 (Middle dosage group), 10 mg kg−1 (High dosage group), respectively. Positive DDP group was that with cisplatin as positive contrast drug. The SD values were obtained in ten independent experiments.

*p<0.05,

**p<0.01.