Table 2.
Agency | Adaptations | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Agency | Program | Direct fiscal | ||||||
ID | Type | Fidelity scorea | Cut staff | Reduce clients | Workload | |||
Increase | Decrease | |||||||
A | DPH | 27 | × | × | × | |||
B | DPH | 35 | × | × | ×b | |||
C | CBO | 41 | ×c | |||||
D | DPH | 45 | × | × | ||||
E | DPH | 48 | × | × | ||||
F | DPH | 49 | × | ×b | ||||
G | DPH | 57 | × | |||||
H | CBO | 60 | × | ×c | ||||
I | DPH | 61 | × | × | ||||
J | DPH | 79 | ×c | |||||
K | CBO | 80 | × | × | × | |||
L | DPH | 81 | ×c | |||||
M | CBO | 85 | ×c | |||||
N | CBO | 88 | ×c | |||||
O | CBO | — | ×b |
Note that Agency O did not provide client data
aFidelity scores range from 0 to 100, with 100 indicating that all clients reporting a risk factor received the full program as measured here
bProgram adaptations: Agency B — initiated express visits; F and O — quality assurance procedure change
cDirect fiscal remedies: Agency C — interagency resource sharing; H, J, and N — intra-program resource sharing (i.e., shifted costs to HIV testing or another program); L — increase in external funding from county; M — deficit rolled into next year's budget