Table 4.
Content validation of IAM4all items: Level 4 - expected benefits.
|
Postinterview items |
Prepanel item development | Expert panel (N=20) | |||||||
| Theoretical model | Critical review | Previous work on the IAM | Consultation with 8 researchers |
Interviews with 16 laypersons |
Item relevance | Clarity | Representa-tiveness | Specificity | |
| Expected benefits | x | x | x | x | x |
|
|
60% | 60% |
| 23. This information decreased my worries about a health problem |
|
x | x | x | x | 90% | 85% |
|
|
| 24. This information increased my satisfaction with the care I receive |
|
x | x | x | x | 90% | 90% |
|
|
| 25. This information allowed (will allow) me to receive additional information from a health professional |
|
x | x | x | x | 75% | 70% |
|
|
| 26. Because of this information, I am (will be) more involved in decisions around my health |
|
x | x | x | x | 100% | 90% |
|
|
| 27. This information helped (will help) me to better handle a problem with my health |
|
x | x | x | x | 100% | 90% |
|
|
| 28. This information helped (will help) me to prevent a disease or the worsening of a disease |
|
x | x | x | x | 85% | 80% |
|
|
| 29. This information helped (will help) to improve my health |
|
x | x | x | x | 100% | 85% |
|
|