Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Curr Diab Rep. 2014 Mar;14(3):471. doi: 10.1007/s11892-013-0471-z

Table 4.

Ranking of Quality Improvement Strategies for lowering HbA1c based on meta-analysis *

Rank Intervention Number of trials Mean difference in HbA1c (95% CI)
1 Promotion of self-management 60 −0.57 (−0.83 to −0.31)
2 Team changes 47 −0.57 (−0.71 to −0.42)
3 Case management 57 −0.50 (−0.65 to −0.36)
4 Patient education 52 −0.48 (−0.61 to −0.34)
5 Facilitated relay of clinical data 32 −0.46 (−0.60 to −0.33)
6 Electronic patient registry 27 −0.42 (−0.61 to −0.24)
7 Patient reminders 21 −0.39 (−0.65 to −0.12)
8 Audit and feedback 8 −0.26 (−0.44 to −0.08)
9 Clinician education 15 −0.19 (−0.35 to −0.03)
10 Clinician reminders 18 −0.16 (−0.31 to −0.02)
All 120 −0.37 (−0.45 to −0.28)
*

Effects were greater with baseline HbA1c>8.0% and less in HbA1c≤8.0%

Adapted from Tricco et al (7).