Table 2.
Simulation results for the estimated breadth using the empirical method, ABH and q-value methods. Estimates are computed as averages over the 1000 simulated data sets. The FDR level is 10%. qval.s represents the q-value method using the natural cubic spline smoother for choosing λ, and qval.b represents the q-value method using the bootstrap for choosing λ.
IC50 | AUC | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Case | B | Method | Empirical | ABH | qval.s | qval.b | ABH | qval.s | qval.b |
σ = 0.05 | |||||||||
1 | 0 | B̂mo | - | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
B̂V+T | 0.6 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | ||
2 | 10 | B̂mo | - | 3.5 | 0.0 | 4.0 | 5.8 | 0.0 | 6.8 |
B̂V+T | 9.0 | 5.1 | 5.0 | 5.1 | 7.5 | 7.3 | 7.5 | ||
3 | 10 | B̂mo | - | 7.7 | 0.0 | 3.3 | 8.0 | 0.0 | 1.4 |
B̂V+T | 10.2 | 9.2 | 9.2 | 9.2 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 10.0 | ||
σ = 0.10 | |||||||||
1 | 0 | B̂mo | - | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
B̂V+T | 1.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | ||
2 | 10 | B̂mo | - | 2.9 | 0.0 | 3.1 | 3.3 | 0.0 | 4.0 |
B̂V+T | 8.7 | 4.4 | 4.4 | 4.4 | 4.3 | 4.2 | 4.3 | ||
3 | 10 | B̂mo | - | 7.4 | 0.0 | 3.2 | 7.8 | 0.0 | 5.5 |
B̂V+T | 10.5 | 9.1 | 9.0 | 9.1 | 9.8 | 9.7 | 9.8 |