Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Mar 19.
Published in final edited form as: Stat Biopharm Res. 2012 May 24;4(1):1–13. doi: 10.1080/19466315.2011.633860

Table 2.

Simulation results for the estimated breadth using the empirical method, ABH and q-value methods. Estimates are computed as averages over the 1000 simulated data sets. The FDR level is 10%. qval.s represents the q-value method using the natural cubic spline smoother for choosing λ, and qval.b represents the q-value method using the bootstrap for choosing λ.

IC50 AUC
Case B Method Empirical ABH qval.s qval.b ABH qval.s qval.b
σ = 0.05
1 0 mo - 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
V+T 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
2 10 mo - 3.5 0.0 4.0 5.8 0.0 6.8
V+T 9.0 5.1 5.0 5.1 7.5 7.3 7.5
3 10 mo - 7.7 0.0 3.3 8.0 0.0 1.4
V+T 10.2 9.2 9.2 9.2 10.0 10.0 10.0
σ = 0.10
1 0 mo - 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
V+T 1.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0
2 10 mo - 2.9 0.0 3.1 3.3 0.0 4.0
V+T 8.7 4.4 4.4 4.4 4.3 4.2 4.3
3 10 mo - 7.4 0.0 3.2 7.8 0.0 5.5
V+T 10.5 9.1 9.0 9.1 9.8 9.7 9.8