Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2014 Jan 28;276(1):21–27. doi: 10.1016/j.taap.2014.01.015

Table 2.

Cross-sectional Analysis of Associations Between Arsenic Exposure and Hematuria at Baseline

As exposure variables* Prevalence of hematuria in %, n (yes/no) Unadjusted OR (95% CI) for hematuria Adjusted OR (95% CI) for hematuria
Baseline well As (μg/l)
 0.1–3 13.2 (212/1399) 1.00 (Ref) 1.00 (Ref)
 3–25 13.7 (214/1345) 1.05 (0.86–1.29) 1.07 (0.87–1.31)
 25–66 12.4 (194/1365) 0.94 (0.76–1.16) 0.95 (0.76–1.17)
 66–142 16.4 (254/1292) 1.30 (1.07–1.58) 1.30 (1.06–1.59)
 142–949.1 20.1 (315/1253) 1.66 (1.37–2.01) 1.66 (1.37–2.02)
 OR per SD increase in exposure variable 1.20 (1.14–1.27) 1.20 (1.13–1.27)
P-value for trend < 0.01 < 0.01
Baseline specific gravity-adjusted urinary As (μg/l)
 1.7–39 11.7 (188/1414) 1.00 (Ref) 1.00 (Ref)
 39–65 14.6 (221/1293) 1.29 (1.04–1.58) 1.29 (1.04–1.59)
 65–106 16.1 (255/1331) 1.44 (1.18–1.77) 1.41 (1.15–1.74)
 106–179.4 16.5 (258/1307) 1.49 (1.21–1.82) 1.46 (1.19–1.79)
 179.4–2334.8 17.0 (266/1300) 1.54 (1.26–1.88) 1.56 (1.27–1.91)
 OR per SD increase in exposure variable 1.06 (1.00–1.12) 1.06 (1.00–1.13)
P-value for trend 0.049 0.047
*

Cut points determined by quintiles of overall study population at baseline.

ORs adjusted for age, BMI, cigarette smoking status, education length, SBP, DBP, and occupational dye exposure.

Reference group.