Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2014 Jan 28;276(1):21–27. doi: 10.1016/j.taap.2014.01.015

Table 3.

Prospective Analysis of Associations Between Arsenic Exposure and Incident Hematuria at Follow-up

As exposure variables* n/person-years HR (95% CI) for incident hematuria during study period
Model 1 Model 2
Baseline well As (μg/l)
 0.1–3§ 142/4543.60 1.00 (Ref) 1.00 (Ref)
 3–25 182/5067.59 1.09 (0.88–1.36) 1.10 (0.88–1.37)
 25–66 170/5223.10 0.96 (0.77–1.20) 0.96 (0.77–1.20)
 66–142 184/5202.52 1.05 (0.84–1.31) 1.05 (0.84–1.31)
 142–949.1 271/5692.30 1.35 (1.10–1.66) 1.34 (1.09–1.65)
 HR per SD increase in exposure variable 1.10 (1.04–1.17) 1.10 (1.04–1.16)
P-value for trend < 0.01 < 0.01
Baseline specific gravity-adjusted urinary As (μg/l)
 1.7–39§ 168/4994.22 1.00 (Ref) 1.00 (Ref)
 39–65 181/4781.56 1.13 (0.92–1.40) 1.13 (0.92–1.40)
 65–106 183/5185.17 1.01 (0.82–1.25) 1.01 (0.82–1.25)
 106–179.4 186/5278.60 1.00 (0.81–1.24) 1.00 (0.81–1.24)
 179.4–2334.8 230/5446.71 1.20 (0.98–1.48) 1.19 (0.97–1.46)
 HR per SD increase in exposure variable 1.06 (1.01–1.12) 1.03 (0.98–1.09)
P-value for trend 0.02 0.27
*

Cut points determined by quintiles of overall study population at baseline.

Adjusted for age, BMI, cigarette smoking status, education length, SBP, DBP, and occupational dye exposure.

Adjusted for age, BMI, cigarette smoking status, education length, SBP, DBP, occupational dye exposure, and change in urinary arsenic before incident visit.

§

Reference group.