Table 4.
Comparison of Rhegmatogenous and Traction Retinal Detachment Outcomes in Published Proliferative Sickle Retinopathy Case Series
| Authors/Year | Institution | Surgical Indication | Procedures | SB | Last Measured VA ≥ 20/400 | Anterior Segment Ischemia |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ryan, Goldberg 1971 | Wilmer/UIC | RRD | 7 | 5 | 71% | 4 |
| TRD +/− RRD | 3 | 3 | 0% | 2 | ||
| Jampol et al 1982 | UIC | RRD | 4 | 4 | 100% | 0 |
| TRD +/− RRD | 10 | 10 | 50% | 1 | ||
| Pulido et al 1988 | BPEI | RRD | 0 | 0 | No cases | 0 |
| TRD +/− RRD | 9 | 6 | 78% | 0 | ||
| Williamson et al 2009 | St. Thomas’ Hospital | RRD | 3 | 0 | 100% | 0 |
| TRD +/− RRD | 2 | 0 | 100% | 0 | ||
| Current Study 2013 | BPEI | RRD | 2 | 0 | 100% | 0 |
| TRD +/− RRD | 6 | 2 | 100% | 0 |
BPEI: Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, University of Miami, RRD: rhegmatogenous retinal detachment, SB: scleral buckle, TRD: tractional retinal detachment, UIC: University of Illinois Eye and Ear Infirmary, VA: visual acuity, Wilmer: Wilmer Institute, Johns Hopkins University