Skip to main content
. 2014 Mar 19;348:g1888. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g1888

Table 1.

 Sensitivity analyses of studies on antidepressant efficacy of agomelatine

Meta-analysis No of studies Effect size (95% CI) I2 (%)
Agomelatine v placebo
Fixed effect model using final scores 12 0.23 (0.17 to 0.30) 66
Random effects model using changes scores 12 0.23 (0.12 to 0.34) 66
Random effects model using ANCOVA estimates (HAM-D scores only) 10 1.9 (0.94 to 2.87)* 68
Random effects model using raw HAM-D final scores 11 1.97 (1.12 to 2.82)† 60
Agomelatine v other antidepressant
Fixed effect model using final scores 13 1.00 (−0.06 to 0.06) 59
Random effects model using changes scores 13 −0.01 (−0.10 to 0.10) 56
Random effects model using raw HAM-D final scores 12 0.06 (−0.40 to 0.53)† 63

*Raw mean differences on HAM-D scale adjusted for baseline scores.

†Raw mean differences on HAM-D scale.