Skip to main content
. 2014 Feb 28;3(1):e000206. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.113.000206

Table 2.

Neurohumoral Data Following M‐ANP, Nitroglycerin, or Vehicle Administration

Treatment MLVD MLVD+HTN Vehicle, M‐ANP, or NTG Infusion Post Vehicle, M‐ANP, or NTG Infusion
30 Minutes 60 Minutes 120 Minutes
ANG II, pg/mL
Vehicle 43±9 181±31* 245±29* 191±25* 174±37.1* 171±27*
M‐ANP 29±7 213±18* 222±39* 201±37* 273±43* 185±15*
NTG 39±11 183±20* 209±52* 249±51* 165±11* 184±23*
Plasma ANP§, pg/mL
Vehicle 193±76 402±185* 435±125* 428±107* 431±103* 547±136*
M‐ANP 173±53 404±182* 1863±464*†‡ 735±180*‡ 408±165 230±91
NTG 204±41 299±22* 190±35‡ 200±27‡ 247±36 264±43
Plasma cGMP§, pg/mL
Vehicle 11.3±1.1 13.9±1.0* 14.4±1.3* 14.1±1.3* 14.4±1.7* 14.9±1.9*
M‐ANP 9.9±0.9 11.7±1.4* 44.7±2.1*†‡ 33.3±1.9*†‡ 20.0±1.3*†‡ 11.9±1.3
NTG 9.5±0.7 12.8±0.5* 11.3±0.6 10.2±0.5† 10.1±0.4† 11.4±0.7
Urine ANP§, pg/min
Vehicle 22.5±2.9 44.3±12.0* 39.1±6.6* 44.6±7.8* 47.3±8.0* 44.2±8.0*
M‐ANP 30.9±11.5 64.8±15.8* 195.2±60.7*†‡ 155.1±50.0*†‡ 57.5±17.2 59.9±28.4
NTG 33.6±9.7 49.6±7.5* 44.1±13.4 41.8±17.9 43.1±18.4 64.4±26.2
Renal cGMP generation§, pmol/min
Vehicle 361±38 574±105 631±104 590±131 641±109 587±98
M‐ANP 288±37 384±55 2514±234*†‡ 1760±268*†‡ 769±62†‡ 430±56
NTG 278±18 435±63 346±28 303±20 332±35 418±65*
Filtered cGMP§, pmol/min
Vehicle 492±42 540±205 454±66 630±126 593±76 756±136
M‐ANP 499±77 570±124 5451±1098*†‡ 5156±1120*†‡ 1762±181*†‡ 914±147
NTG 507±55 433±110 524±64 509±56 441±37 739±75*
Plasma aldosterone, ng/dL
Vehicle 13.1±3.2 30.9±3.7* 38.1±2.0*† 40.9±2.6*† 39.4±3.1*† 45.3±4.5*†
M‐ANP 9.8±1.4 31.5±3.0* 23.2±2.0*† 26.3±2.5* 37.9±3.4* 46.8±3.6*†
NTG 11.1±3.8 27.0±5.5* 34.7±6.0* 37.4±6.0*† 39.5±5.7*† 41.8±4.2*†

ANG II indicates angiotensin II; ANOVA, analysis of variance; cGMP, cyclic guanosine monophosphate; M‐ANP, M‐atrial natriuretic peptide; MLVD, mild left ventricular dysfunction; MLVD+HTN, MLVD and angiotensin II induced hypertension; NTG, nitroglycerin.

*P<0.05 vs MLVD and P<0.05 vs MLVD+HTN, 2‐way ANOVA with pairwise comparison of individual time points within groups using the Tukey HSD methods.

P<0.05 vs NTG at a specific time point, 2‐way ANOVA with Bonferroni posttests.

§P interaction <0.05 for the main effects of treatment and time between M‐ANP vs NTG, 2‐way ANOVA.