Table 3.
Aspect | Technique | Description |
---|---|---|
Credibility How reflective of reality are the research findings? |
Field observation | DK observed patient encounters in heart failure clinics and palliative care home visits during study design. |
Iterative questioning36 | We employed deliberate, explicit probes in order to understand participants' responses with greater precision. | |
Expert review of protocol | Disciplinary experts assisted in the development of the interview guide and patient vignette. | |
Frequent debriefing | Weekly meetings were held between the lead and senior authors to discuss findings and concerns. | |
Transferability How applicable are the research findings to other contexts or situations? |
Contextual review | We performed a detailed literature review to understand the context within which our work falls. |
Dependability How reproducible are the research findings? |
Audit trail | We maintained an extensive audit trail throughout the analytic process, detailing decision rules and justifications. |
Confirmability How objective was the analysis? |
Bracketing42 | Recognition of investigators' preconceptions and assumptions regarding the phenomena of interest. |
Triangulation | Investigator triangulation (ie, multiple researchers analyzed data) and disciplinary triangulation (ie, researchers represented a variety of related expertise). | |
Member checking41 | Interview participants were invited to review this manuscript before submission for publication. |