Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Mar 19.
Published in final edited form as: Hum Mutat. 2012 Feb 28;33(4):599–608. doi: 10.1002/humu.22035

Table 1.

Example Candidate List Annotations

Item Name Annotation Sources* Implementation Notes
Identifier (unique for each variant in candidate list) Sequencing/Assembling/Genotyping Facility**, GATK
Chromosome Number Sequencing/Assembling/Genotyping Facility**, GATK
Variant Position Within Chromosome Sequencing/Assembling/Genotyping Facility**, GATK Positions are given in the context of a specific reference genome, e.g. NCBI hg18/build36
Reference allele Sequencing/Asembling/Genotyping Facility**, GATK
Variant allele Sequencing/Asembling/Genotyping Facility**, GATK
Variant type (exon, intron, etc.) Annovar, SeattleSeq, GATK, VAAST
Gene name Annovar, SeattleSeq, GATK, VAAST
Transcript Annovar, SeattleSeq, GATK, VAAST
Strand Annovar, SeattleSeq, GATK, VAAST
Reference Amino Acid Annovar, SeattleSeq, GATK, VAAST
Variant Amino Acid Annovar, SeattleSeq, GATK, VAAST
Amino Acid Position Annovar, SeattleSeq, GATK, VAAST
Pathogenicity Score Galaxy, GATK, PolyPhen, many others NISC provides “CDPred” score
Coverage Samtools, Bed tools, GATK
Quality Measure Samtools, GATK NISC provides MPG and MPG/coverage scores. Quality scores should be calibrated to a specific sequencing center/source
Mendelian Consistency for various genetic models Manual inspection with spreadsheet, VAR-MD, VAAST NISC provides annotation with in-house software
Compound Heterozygote Pairing for Autosomal Recessive Genetic Model Manual inspection with spreadsheet NISC provides annotation with in-house software
*

These are incomplete lists. A broad and rapidly expanding list of tools is available.

**

Often a collaborating sequencing facility can provide some or all of the annotations listed here. Most of the annotations can be carried out separately if needed. However, synergistic benefits can accrue if assembling and genotyping are performed by the same team.